From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Clayton <andrew@digital-domain.net>
Subject: Re: RAID 5 performance issue.
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 21:46:28 +0100
Message-ID: <20071003214628.0d28af5a@alpha.digital-domain.net>
References: <20071003105321.06943824@zeus.pccl.info>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0710031243080.8612@p34.internal.lan>
	<20071003211910.439ded54@alpha.digital-domain.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0710031634100.4897@p34.internal.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710031634100.4897@p34.internal.lan>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Andrew Clayton <andrew@pccl.info>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 16:35:21 -0400 (EDT), Justin Piszcz wrote:

> What does cat /sys/block/md0/md/mismatch_cnt say?

$ cat /sys/block/md0/md/mismatch_cnt
0

> That fragmentation looks normal/fine.

Cool.

> Justin.

Andrew