From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, M@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stable <stable@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 000 of 2] md: Fixes for md in 2.6.23
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:43:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071114034325.GA25558@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9c3a7c20711131936t3c5f858cm8937b24d97fe998c@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1545 bytes --]
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 08:36:05PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2007 5:23 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:22:14PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:15:27PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It appears that a couple of bugs slipped in to md for 2.6.23.
> > > > These two patches fix them and are appropriate for 2.6.23.y as well
> > > > as 2.6.24-rcX
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > NeilBrown
> > > >
> > > > [PATCH 001 of 2] md: Fix an unsigned compare to allow creation of bitmaps with v1.0 metadata.
> > > > [PATCH 002 of 2] md: raid5: fix clearing of biofill operations
> > >
> > > I don't see these patches in 2.6.24-rcX, are they there under some other
> > > subject?
> >
> > Oh nevermind, I found them, sorry for the noise...
> >
>
> Careful, it looks like you cherry picked commit 4ae3f847 "md: raid5:
> fix clearing of biofill operations" which ended up misapplied in
> Linus' tree, You should either also pick up def6ae26 "md: fix
> misapplied patch in raid5.c" or I can resend the original "raid5: fix
> clearing of biofill operations."
>
> The other patch for -stable "raid5: fix unending write sequence" is
> currently in -mm.
Hm, I've attached the two patches that I have right now in the -stable
tree so far (still have over 100 patches to go, so I might not have
gotten to them yet if you have sent them). These were sent to me by
Andrew on their way to Linus. if I should drop either one, or add
another one, please let me know.
thanks,
greg k-h
[-- Attachment #2: md-fix-an-unsigned-compare-to-allow-creation-of-bitmaps-with-v1.0-metadata.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1262 bytes --]
From stable-bounces@linux.kernel.org Mon Oct 22 20:45:35 2007
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:45:11 -0700
Subject: md: fix an unsigned compare to allow creation of bitmaps with v1.0 metadata
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: neilb@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@kernel.org
Message-ID: <200710230345.l9N3jB65030288@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
patch 85bfb4da8cad483a4e550ec89060d05a4daf895b in mainline.
As page->index is unsigned, this all becomes an unsigned comparison, which
almost always returns an error.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
drivers/md/bitmap.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/md/bitmap.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static int write_sb_page(struct bitmap *
if (bitmap->offset < 0) {
/* DATA BITMAP METADATA */
if (bitmap->offset
- + page->index * (PAGE_SIZE/512)
+ + (long)(page->index * (PAGE_SIZE/512))
+ size/512 > 0)
/* bitmap runs in to metadata */
return -EINVAL;
[-- Attachment #3: md-raid5-fix-clearing-of-biofill-operations.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2399 bytes --]
From stable-bounces@linux.kernel.org Mon Oct 22 20:45:44 2007
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:45:11 -0700
Subject: md: raid5: fix clearing of biofill operations
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: joel.bertrand@systella.fr, neilb@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, stable@kernel.org
Message-ID: <200710230345.l9N3jC2M030292@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
patch 4ae3f847e49e3787eca91bced31f8fd328d50496 in mainline.
ops_complete_biofill() runs outside of spin_lock(&sh->lock) and clears the
'pending' and 'ack' bits. Since the test_and_ack_op() macro only checks
against 'complete' it can get an inconsistent snapshot of pending work.
Move the clearing of these bits to handle_stripe5(), under the lock.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Bertrand <joel.bertrand@systella.fr>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -377,7 +377,12 @@ static unsigned long get_stripe_work(str
ack++;
sh->ops.count -= ack;
- BUG_ON(sh->ops.count < 0);
+ if (unlikely(sh->ops.count < 0)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "pending: %#lx ops.pending: %#lx ops.ack: %#lx "
+ "ops.complete: %#lx\n", pending, sh->ops.pending,
+ sh->ops.ack, sh->ops.complete);
+ BUG();
+ }
return pending;
}
@@ -551,8 +556,7 @@ static void ops_complete_biofill(void *s
}
}
}
- clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.ack);
- clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.pending);
+ set_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.complete);
return_io(return_bi);
@@ -2903,6 +2907,13 @@ static void handle_stripe6(struct stripe
s.expanded = test_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_READY, &sh->state);
/* Now to look around and see what can be done */
+ /* clean-up completed biofill operations */
+ if (test_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.complete)) {
+ clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.pending);
+ clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.ack);
+ clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.complete);
+ }
+
rcu_read_lock();
for (i=disks; i--; ) {
mdk_rdev_t *rdev;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-14 3:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-22 7:15 [PATCH 000 of 2] md: Fixes for md in 2.6.23 NeilBrown
2007-10-22 7:15 ` [PATCH 001 of 2] md: Fix an unsigned compare to allow creation of bitmaps with v1.0 metadata NeilBrown
2007-10-22 7:15 ` [PATCH 002 of 2] md: raid5: fix clearing of biofill operations NeilBrown
2007-11-14 0:22 ` [stable] [PATCH 000 of 2] md: Fixes for md in 2.6.23 Greg KH
2007-11-14 0:23 ` Greg KH
2007-11-14 3:36 ` Dan Williams
2007-11-14 3:43 ` Greg KH [this message]
2007-11-14 5:36 ` Dan Williams
2007-11-14 22:34 ` Greg KH
2007-11-15 5:22 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071114034325.GA25558@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=M@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).