From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Janek Kozicki Subject: Re: raid10: unfair disk load? Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 13:05:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20071222130559.68b773fd@absurd> References: <476BA4FD.6080401@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <476BA942.40406@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <20071221174902.6fc02c4e@absurd> <476C2869.1080903@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <476C2869.1080903@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Tokarev Cc: Linux RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids Michael Tokarev said: (by the date of Fri, 21 Dec 2007 23:56:09 +0300) > Janek Kozicki wrote: > > what's your kernel version? I recall that recently there have been > > some works regarding load balancing. > > It was in my original email: > The kernel is 2.6.23 > > Strange I missed the new raid10 development you > mentioned (I follow linux-raid quite closely). > What change(s) you're referring to? oh sorry it was a patch for raid1, not raid10: http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg17708.html I'm wondering if it could be adapted for raid10 ... Konstantin Sharlaimov said: (by the date of Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:08:42 +1000) > This patch adds RAID1 read balancing to device mapper. A read operation > that is close (in terms of sectors) to a previous read or write goes to > the same mirror. -- Janek Kozicki |