From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keld =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F8rn?= Simonsen Subject: Re: which raid level gives maximum overall speed? (raid-10,f2 vs. raid-0) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:55:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20080205225534.GA32053@rap.rap.dk> References: <20080130192133.17b254bf@szpak> <20080130220007.GG20173@rap.rap.dk> <20080130233639.5d46b044@szpak> <20080131015506.GB6617@rap.rap.dk> <20080205161036.GA30326@rap.rap.dk> <20080205200423.GB17621@rap.rap.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Justin Piszcz Cc: Janek Kozicki , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 05:28:27PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: > > > >Could you give some figures? > > I remember testing with bonnie++ and raid10 was about half the speed > (200-265 MiB/s) as RAID5 (400-420 MiB/s) for sequential output, but input > was closer to RAID5 speeds/did not seem affected (~550MiB/s). Impressive. What levet of raid10 was involved? and what type of equipment, how many disks? Maybe the better output for raid5 could be due to some striping - AFAIK raid5 will be striping quite well, and writes almost equal to reading time indicates that the writes are striping too. best regards keld