From: Janek Kozicki <janek_listy@wp.pl>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: which raid level gives maximum overall speed? (raid-10,f2 vs. raid-0)
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:52:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080205235215.750ea879@szpak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0802051726510.10352@p34.internal.lan>
Justin Piszcz said: (by the date of Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:28:27 -0500 (EST))
> I remember testing with bonnie++ and raid10 was about half the speed
> (200-265 MiB/s) as RAID5 (400-420 MiB/s) for sequential output,
writing on raid10 is supposed to be half the speed of reading. That's
because it must write to both mirrors.
IMHO raid5 could perform good here, because in *continuous* write
operation the blocks from other HDDs were just have been written,
they stay in cache and can be used to calculate xor. So you could get
close to almost raid-0 performance here.
Randomly scattered small-sized write operations will kill raid5
performance, for sure. Because corresponding blocks from few other
drives must be read, to calculate parity correctly. I'm wondering
how much raid5 performance would go down... Is there a bonnie++ test
for that, or any other benchmark software for this?
> but input was closer to RAID5 speeds/did not seem affected (~550MiB/s).
reading in raid5 and raid10 is supposed to be close to raid-0 speed.
--
Janek Kozicki |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-05 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-30 18:21 which raid level gives maximum overall speed? (raid-10,f2 vs. raid-0) Janek Kozicki
2008-01-30 22:00 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-01-30 22:36 ` Janek Kozicki
2008-01-31 1:55 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-01-31 14:01 ` Janek Kozicki
2008-02-05 16:10 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-02-05 16:54 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-02-05 20:04 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-02-05 22:28 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-02-05 22:52 ` Janek Kozicki [this message]
2008-02-06 9:06 ` Peter Rabbitson
[not found] ` <47A9F96E.7050307@tmr.com>
2008-02-06 22:15 ` Janek Kozicki
2008-02-05 22:55 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-02-05 22:58 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-01-31 15:30 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080205235215.750ea879@szpak \
--to=janek_listy@wp.pl \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).