From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lars =?UTF-8?B?VMOkdWJlcg==?= <taeuber@bbaw.de>
Subject: Re: equal size not large enough for RAID1?
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 12:08:54 +0100
Message-ID: <20080307120854.20ed979d.taeuber@bbaw.de>
References: <20080305100547.2634bd04.taeuber@bbaw.de>
	<18383.24086.165437.659336@notabene.brown>
	<20080306101157.52d482b3.taeuber@bbaw.de>
	<18384.47607.709703.403641@notabene.brown>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <18384.47607.709703.403641@notabene.brown>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Hallo Neil,

> Hmm..  I just read through the change logs and I see there was a bug
> here that was fixed in 2.6.3.
> If you want an update from SuSE you would need to log a bug report in
> the Novell bugzilla.
> 
> Alternately request v0.90 metadata (--metadata=0.90)  That will avoid
> the bug.
> 
> NeilBrown

thank you for this info. I'll try to get SuSE to correct this.
I just created a bugzilla account.

Thanks again.

Lars