From: Bernd Schubert <bs@q-leap.de>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: parallel resync
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:59:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804291159.27967.bs@q-leap.de> (raw)
Hello Neil,
I think in about December I already asked if you could include our parallel
resync patch. We need this patch, since we are doing software raid over
fast hardware raid devices and with these hardware raid system the cpu is
the bottleneck and not disk i/o.
Here is the previous thread: http://www.issociate.de/board/post/470063/[PATCH]_(2nd_try)_force_parallel_resync.html
Is there any chance you could add this patch as well, or if the patch is
not suitable yet, could you please tell me what needs to be done?
Index: linus/drivers/md/md.c
===================================================================
--- linus.orig/drivers/md/md.c
+++ linus/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pers_lock);
static void md_print_devices(void);
+static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(resync_wait);
+
#define MD_BUG(x...) { printk("md: bug in file %s, line %d\n", __FILE__, __LINE__); md_print_devices(); }
/*
@@ -2979,6 +2981,34 @@ degraded_show(mddev_t *mddev, char *page
static struct md_sysfs_entry md_degraded = __ATTR_RO(degraded);
static ssize_t
+sync_force_parallel_show(mddev_t *mddev, char *page)
+{
+ return sprintf(page, "%d\n", mddev->parallel_resync);
+}
+
+static ssize_t
+sync_force_parallel_store(mddev_t *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
+{
+ char *e;
+ unsigned long n = simple_strtoul(buf, &e, 10);
+
+ if (!*buf || (*e && *e != '\n') || (n != 0 && n != 1))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ mddev->parallel_resync = n;
+
+ if (mddev->sync_thread) {
+ wake_up(&resync_wait);
+ }
+ return len;
+}
+
+/* force parallel resync, even with shared block devices */
+static struct md_sysfs_entry md_sync_force_parallel =
+__ATTR(sync_force_parallel, S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR,
+ sync_force_parallel_show, sync_force_parallel_store);
+
+static ssize_t
sync_speed_show(mddev_t *mddev, char *page)
{
unsigned long resync, dt, db;
@@ -3153,6 +3183,7 @@ static struct attribute *md_redundancy_a
&md_sync_min.attr,
&md_sync_max.attr,
&md_sync_speed.attr,
+ &md_sync_force_parallel.attr,
&md_sync_completed.attr,
&md_max_sync.attr,
&md_suspend_lo.attr,
@@ -5413,8 +5444,6 @@ void md_allow_write(mddev_t *mddev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(md_allow_write);
-static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(resync_wait);
-
#define SYNC_MARKS 10
#define SYNC_MARK_STEP (3*HZ)
void md_do_sync(mddev_t *mddev)
@@ -5478,8 +5507,9 @@ void md_do_sync(mddev_t *mddev)
for_each_mddev(mddev2, tmp) {
if (mddev2 == mddev)
continue;
- if (mddev2->curr_resync &&
- match_mddev_units(mddev,mddev2)) {
+ if (!mddev->parallel_resync
+ && mddev2->curr_resync
+ && match_mddev_units(mddev,mddev2)) {
DEFINE_WAIT(wq);
if (mddev < mddev2 && mddev->curr_resync == 2) {
/* arbitrarily yield */
Index: linus/include/linux/raid/md_k.h
===================================================================
--- linus.orig/include/linux/raid/md_k.h
+++ linus/include/linux/raid/md_k.h
@@ -176,6 +176,9 @@ struct mddev_s
int sync_speed_min;
int sync_speed_max;
+ /* resync even though the same disks are shared among md-devices */
+ int parallel_resync;
+
int ok_start_degraded;
/* recovery/resync flags
* NEEDED: we might need to start a resync/recover
Thanks,
Bernd
--
Bernd Schubert
Q-Leap Networks GmbH
next reply other threads:[~2008-04-29 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-29 9:59 Bernd Schubert [this message]
2008-05-01 5:35 ` parallel resync Neil Brown
2008-05-01 21:17 ` Bernd Schubert
2008-05-02 0:28 ` Neil Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-29 17:51 Luca Berra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200804291159.27967.bs@q-leap.de \
--to=bs@q-leap.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).