From: Bernd Schubert <bs@q-leap.de>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: parallel resync
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 23:17:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805012317.14370.bs@q-leap.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18457.22180.38604.335076@notabene.brown>
On Thursday 01 May 2008 07:35:32 Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday April 29, bs@q-leap.de wrote:
>
> Sorry for not responding earlier....
No problem, we are all always overly busy ;)
>
> I seem to remember the setting used to be global, but I see in this
> patch it is per-array -- which makes much more sense.
> Though it brings up an interesting question. If two arrays share a
> device, and exactly one of them is flagged for parallel sync, does
> that make sense?
>
> Maybe it does. I suspect the reality is that it is individual devices
> that should be flagged for parallel sync or not, and the setting on
> the array is just an "and" of the settings for the devices in the
> array. So different settings on arrays which share one device can
> make sense...
>
> Note: I'm *not* suggesting that the setting should be moved to the
> component devices - that would be too clumsy. I'm just musing.
>
> If get 3 errors and 2 warnings from ./scripts/checkpatch.pl. If you
> fix those I'll take the patch.
Below is a new version of the patch. If kmail should break something, I
also uploaded it here:
http://www.pci.uni-heidelberg.de/tc/usr/bernd/downloads/md/parallel_resync.patch
Unfortunately I presently don't have any non-production system I could
easily reboot to test the new version on.
Thanks,
Bernd
Allow parallel resync of md-devices.
Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bs@q-leap.de>
Index: linus/drivers/md/md.c
===================================================================
--- linus.orig/drivers/md/md.c
+++ linus/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pers_lock);
static void md_print_devices(void);
+static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(resync_wait);
+
#define MD_BUG(x...) { printk("md: bug in file %s, line %d\n", __FILE__, __LINE__); md_print_devices(); }
/*
@@ -2979,6 +2981,36 @@ degraded_show(mddev_t *mddev, char *page
static struct md_sysfs_entry md_degraded = __ATTR_RO(degraded);
static ssize_t
+sync_force_parallel_show(mddev_t *mddev, char *page)
+{
+ return sprintf(page, "%d\n", mddev->parallel_resync);
+}
+
+static ssize_t
+sync_force_parallel_store(mddev_t *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
+{
+ long n;
+
+ if (strict_strtol(buf, 10, &n))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (n != 0 && n != 1)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ mddev->parallel_resync = n;
+
+ if (mddev->sync_thread)
+ wake_up(&resync_wait);
+
+ return len;
+}
+
+/* force parallel resync, even with shared block devices */
+static struct md_sysfs_entry md_sync_force_parallel =
+__ATTR(sync_force_parallel, S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR,
+ sync_force_parallel_show, sync_force_parallel_store);
+
+static ssize_t
sync_speed_show(mddev_t *mddev, char *page)
{
unsigned long resync, dt, db;
@@ -3153,6 +3185,7 @@ static struct attribute *md_redundancy_a
&md_sync_min.attr,
&md_sync_max.attr,
&md_sync_speed.attr,
+ &md_sync_force_parallel.attr,
&md_sync_completed.attr,
&md_max_sync.attr,
&md_suspend_lo.attr,
@@ -5413,8 +5446,6 @@ void md_allow_write(mddev_t *mddev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(md_allow_write);
-static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(resync_wait);
-
#define SYNC_MARKS 10
#define SYNC_MARK_STEP (3*HZ)
void md_do_sync(mddev_t *mddev)
@@ -5478,8 +5509,9 @@ void md_do_sync(mddev_t *mddev)
for_each_mddev(mddev2, tmp) {
if (mddev2 == mddev)
continue;
- if (mddev2->curr_resync &&
- match_mddev_units(mddev,mddev2)) {
+ if (!mddev->parallel_resync
+ && mddev2->curr_resync
+ && match_mddev_units(mddev, mddev2)) {
DEFINE_WAIT(wq);
if (mddev < mddev2 && mddev->curr_resync == 2) {
/* arbitrarily yield */
Index: linus/include/linux/raid/md_k.h
===================================================================
--- linus.orig/include/linux/raid/md_k.h
+++ linus/include/linux/raid/md_k.h
@@ -176,6 +176,9 @@ struct mddev_s
int sync_speed_min;
int sync_speed_max;
+ /* resync even though the same disks are shared among md-devices */
+ int parallel_resync;
+
int ok_start_degraded;
/* recovery/resync flags
* NEEDED: we might need to start a resync/recover
--
Bernd Schubert
Q-Leap Networks GmbH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-01 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-29 9:59 parallel resync Bernd Schubert
2008-05-01 5:35 ` Neil Brown
2008-05-01 21:17 ` Bernd Schubert [this message]
2008-05-02 0:28 ` Neil Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-29 17:51 Luca Berra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200805012317.14370.bs@q-leap.de \
--to=bs@q-leap.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).