linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Keld Jørn Simonsen" <keld@dkuug.dk>
To: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>
Cc: David Rees <drees76@gmail.com>, David Lethe <david@santools.com>,
	alex14641@yahoo.com, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sharing disks amoung multiple software RAIDs
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 12:25:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080502102500.GB16198@rap.rap.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1209715763.7827.2.camel@localhost>

On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 10:09:23AM +0200, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 00:06 -0700, David Rees wrote:
> > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk> wrote:
> > >  in other words, would i be
> > >  safer to run rsync every day to my other disk, and run in non-raid
> > >  mode?!
> > 
> > What would be safer is to run rsync every day from one redundant array
> > to another array - preferably on another machine that is located as
> > far away as possible from the one that you are backing up.
> > 
> > RAID is not the same as a backup, though unfortunately, too many
> > people treat it as such.
> Im not treating it as a backup, what i want, is to make sure that if 1
> disk dies, the data is still intact and ill hopefully be able to run
> with 1 disk till the newly ordered one arrives - and while i naturally
> will keep offsite backups of most important data, it is certainly far
> easier to simply rip out a faulty disk, and put in another, instead of
> restoring from backup from scratch..
> 
> So my question remains.. Is md raid1 not suited for this need? would it
> be safer to run in non-raid1 mode and daily(maybe hourly) rsync
> everything over to the second disk?

I join in on this question. I have written a howto on our linux raid
page, that exactly advocates a way to with 2 drives use these 2 drives
for multiple partitions, of different types of RAID. The partitions
include /boot / /home and swap - which are actually all allocated 
as RAID partitions on the same 2 drives. See
http://linux-raid.osdl.org/index.php/Preventing_against_a_failing_disk

I am trying to advocate that this be a recommended setup for normal
workstations, to for the price of one extra harddisk get additional
safety and performance.

My take is that Linux RAID code is so stable, including in the degarded
mode, that this is robust and stable. However, there are still bugs to
be found, so you can never be 100 % sure. 

Best regards
keld

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-05-02 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-01 11:35 Sharing disks amoung multiple software RAIDs Alex Davis
2008-05-01 12:50 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-05-01 13:42   ` Alex Davis
2008-05-02 21:24     ` Bill Davidsen
2008-05-02  1:39   ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-05-02  1:51     ` Alex Davis
2008-05-02  2:31       ` David Lethe
2008-05-02  2:42         ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-05-02  7:06           ` David Rees
2008-05-02  8:09             ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-05-02  8:25               ` David Greaves
2008-05-02 21:43                 ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-05-02 22:04                   ` Alex Davis
2008-05-02 22:24                   ` David Lethe
2008-05-03  0:44                     ` Alex Davis
2008-05-03 10:13                       ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-05-03  3:11                     ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-05-02 10:25               ` Keld Jørn Simonsen [this message]
     [not found]                 ` <481E0726.1030501@harddata.com>
     [not found]                   ` <20080504212927.GB20650@rap.rap.dk>
     [not found]                     ` <481E3374.4070105@harddata.com>
2008-05-04 23:10                       ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-05-04 23:17                         ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-05-02 13:43               ` Helge Hafting
2008-05-02 14:13                 ` Alex Davis
2008-05-01 12:51 ` David Greaves
2008-05-02  1:23 ` Nick Andrew
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-02  8:36 George Spelvin
2008-05-02 11:07 ` Alex Davis
2008-05-02 13:26   ` Richard Michael

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080502102500.GB16198@rap.rap.dk \
    --to=keld@dkuug.dk \
    --cc=alex14641@yahoo.com \
    --cc=david@santools.com \
    --cc=drees76@gmail.com \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@metanurb.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).