From: "Keld Jørn Simonsen" <keld@dkuug.dk>
To: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net>
Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>,
Linux-Raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Awful Raid10,f2 performance
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 20:30:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080602183004.GD7990@rap.rap.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cccedfc60806020809t73794ce6w539c6b0d247a264f@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:09:46AM -0500, Jon Nelson wrote:
> i can't show you raw write values, but I can show you raw read values
> (after dropping the caches):
>
> >From dstat, this shows disks sdb, sdc, and sdd values in read (space)
> write format, with the total on the end.
>
> Thus:
>
> 70M 0 : 71M 0 : 72M 0 : 213M 0
> 71M 0 : 70M 0 : 69M 0 : 210M 0
> 71M 0 : 73M 0 : 74M 0 : 217M 0
>
> shows that I'm getting 70+- MB/s on each disk, combined to 210 to 217MB/s.
> These are read values.
>
> I created a logical volume (50G), dropped the caches again, and issued:
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/raid/test bs=64k
>
> and got from 100 to 150MB/s sustained write speeds.
> NOTE: this is with a bitmap (internal)
> Without a bitmap (removed for this test), I get a much more consistent
> 130-150MB/s.
70 MB/s sounds like as expected.
> dd reports a mere 70MB/s when complete.
> When using oflag=direct, I get about 100MB/s combined, with a
> "reported" speed of 51.9MB/s.
> Since I'm using 3x drives, my total I/O is going to be about 2x what dd "sees".
>
> Does that help?
It does not explain a 7 MB/s rate.
the 52 MB/s writing seems as expected - maybe a bit slow, but not very
slow. I do not know is a 3-disk raid10,f2 has specific performance
problems.
You could try the command (md3 being my raid)
blockdev --setra 65536 /dev/md3
It solved some performance problems for me.
Best regards
keld
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-02 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-02 14:11 Awful Raid10,f2 performance Jon Nelson
2008-06-02 14:53 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-06-02 15:09 ` Jon Nelson
2008-06-02 18:30 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen [this message]
2008-12-15 13:33 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-15 21:38 ` Neil Brown
2008-12-16 2:47 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-16 4:03 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-12-16 4:28 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-16 10:10 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-12-16 15:26 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-16 15:53 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-16 22:01 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080602183004.GD7990@rap.rap.dk \
--to=keld@dkuug.dk \
--cc=jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).