From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keld =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F8rn?= Simonsen Subject: Re: raid10,f2 degraded read speed Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:20:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20080626142005.GA5754@rap.rap.dk> References: <20080617143745.GA9148@rap.rap.dk> <20080625172516.GA21707@rap.rap.dk> <20080626081701.GE23500@rap.rap.dk> <20080626133708.GA5462@rap.rap.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Nelson Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:38:47AM -0500, Jon Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Keld J=F8rn Simonsen = wrote: > > Such is life. So then, when this is out, could I then use your find= ings > > for the wiki? >=20 > I don't see why not. My findings are just as useless as everybody els= e's. Nah, I actually think that your findings were some of the more pedagogical, and useful of the benchmarks I have seen on Linux RAID. You did a comprehensive test of the interesting raid types, had it converted to a factor of raw read speed, and even had graphics.=20 Quite instructive. So cheers up, grumpy middelaged man! I look forward to your new tests. keld -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html