* Collection of benchmarks on RAID5,6 and 10
@ 2008-07-11 14:22 Jon Nelson
2008-07-12 11:32 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-12 13:21 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jon Nelson @ 2008-07-11 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LinuxRaid
Some of you may be interested in a a big blog article I wrote on
raid5,6 and 10 performance, primarily comparing various chunk sizes
and the impact they made.
I did get some interesting (to me) results, and have some unanswered questions.
I also re-did the tests using deadline and anticipatory (and noop is
planned) and will add another entry comparing those results to cfq,
which is what I used above.
http://pycurious.blogspot.com/
--
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Collection of benchmarks on RAID5,6 and 10
2008-07-11 14:22 Collection of benchmarks on RAID5,6 and 10 Jon Nelson
@ 2008-07-12 11:32 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-12 14:30 ` Jon Nelson
2008-07-12 13:21 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Justin Piszcz @ 2008-07-12 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Nelson; +Cc: LinuxRaid
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Jon Nelson wrote:
> Some of you may be interested in a a big blog article I wrote on
> raid5,6 and 10 performance, primarily comparing various chunk sizes
> and the impact they made.
> I did get some interesting (to me) results, and have some unanswered questions.
>
> I also re-did the tests using deadline and anticipatory (and noop is
> planned) and will add another entry comparing those results to cfq,
> which is what I used above.
>
> http://pycurious.blogspot.com/
Nice benchmarks, what did you use to make the graphs?
Also, for all of your RAID configuration/systems, what do you use for
your servers/stability after benchmarking multiple configurations?
Justin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Collection of benchmarks on RAID5,6 and 10
2008-07-11 14:22 Collection of benchmarks on RAID5,6 and 10 Jon Nelson
2008-07-12 11:32 ` Justin Piszcz
@ 2008-07-12 13:21 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-07-13 17:11 ` Jon Nelson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Keld Jørn Simonsen @ 2008-07-12 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Nelson; +Cc: LinuxRaid
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:22:10AM -0500, Jon Nelson wrote:
> Some of you may be interested in a a big blog article I wrote on
> raid5,6 and 10 performance, primarily comparing various chunk sizes
> and the impact they made.
> I did get some interesting (to me) results, and have some unanswered questions.
Could you summarize the interesting results?
> I also re-did the tests using deadline and anticipatory (and noop is
> planned) and will add another entry comparing those results to cfq,
> which is what I used above.
>
> http://pycurious.blogspot.com/
Thanks, Jon!
I added a reference to this on the wiki.
best regards
keld
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Collection of benchmarks on RAID5,6 and 10
2008-07-12 11:32 ` Justin Piszcz
@ 2008-07-12 14:30 ` Jon Nelson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jon Nelson @ 2008-07-12 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Justin Piszcz; +Cc: LinuxRaid
>> http://pycurious.blogspot.com/
>
> Nice benchmarks, what did you use to make the graphs?
Thanks! I used flot (a jQuery plugin).
However, I've redone the code that creates the graphs and have
switched to google charts.
You can see a preview here:
http://www.jamponi.net/more_raid/graphs.html
I'll be revising that post to use the new graphs (unless people
holler) and to include a 2048 chunk size as per Neil's suggestion.
A future installment will show the effects of the various schedulers
(you can see the graphs for that in the link above), and yet another
installment may show filesystems over raid (and possibly filesystems
over lvm over raid).
> Also, for all of your RAID configuration/systems, what do you use for your
> servers/stability after benchmarking multiple configurations?
I'm using raid10,f2 right now but I may switch to raid6. I was using
raid5 previously. One big difference between the benchmarks and my
system is that I am using 3 drives and the benchmarks show 4.
--
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Collection of benchmarks on RAID5,6 and 10
2008-07-12 13:21 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
@ 2008-07-13 17:11 ` Jon Nelson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jon Nelson @ 2008-07-13 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keld Jørn Simonsen; +Cc: LinuxRaid
I made some significant revisions to the entry to include each of the
four IO schedulers:
cfq (what I originally used), anticipatory, deadline, and noop,
removed the 128K chunk size and added 2048K (at Neil Brown's
suggestion), and re-did the graphs using google charts.
If anybody has any trouble viewing it please contact me OFF-LIST or
add a comment to the blog.
I actively welcome comments and suggestions.
See http://pycurious.blogspot.com/
--
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-13 17:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-11 14:22 Collection of benchmarks on RAID5,6 and 10 Jon Nelson
2008-07-12 11:32 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-12 14:30 ` Jon Nelson
2008-07-12 13:21 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-07-13 17:11 ` Jon Nelson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).