From: "Keld Jørn Simonsen" <keld@dkuug.dk>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Richard Michael <rmichael-raid@edgeofthenet.org>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Docs and operation of RAID10, size limitations on 0.90
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:29:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080730182907.GB10710@rap.rap.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4890943E.5060608@tmr.com>
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:18:06PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Richard Michael wrote:
> >Hello list,
> >
> >I'm building a new system with 8 disks, in two RAID5 arrays of 4 disks
> >each, and a RAID1 array across them. (Then LVM2 on top of the RAID1
> >array.)
> >
> >I approached it this way for two reasons:
> >
> >1/ It feels "cleanest"; in the sense that it's not a special case, it's
> >just RAID1 with two devices, which happen to be RAID5.
To me it seems muddy. Just having one big raid5 or raid10 would be cleaner and
give better performance.
> >2/ I have a particular usage in mind: I need to be able to split the
> >mirror and remove half; return it later and resync. Therefore, I want
> >to know which disks comprise which halves.
I am not sure what you mean with this. You want to remove half of the
disks? I think you can do that with raid10, you just remove every other
disk. I have not tried that out, however. You could try it out before
actually emplouing it.
> >However, I'm rethinking toward RAID10. However, I can't find much
> >documentation about layout, etc. I believe this was recently discussed
> >on the list.
There is documentation on http://linux-raid.osdl.org/
and on http://std.dkuug.dk/keld/stripemirror.html (for raid10,f2), and
on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-standard_RAID_levels
Best regards
keld
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-30 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-28 14:35 Docs and operation of RAID10, size limitations on 0.90 Richard Michael
2008-07-30 16:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-07-30 16:53 ` Richard Michael
2008-07-30 18:29 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen [this message]
2008-07-30 21:49 ` Richard Michael
2008-07-30 21:56 ` Jon Nelson
2008-07-30 22:47 ` Richard Michael
2008-07-31 1:11 ` Jon Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080730182907.GB10710@rap.rap.dk \
--to=keld@dkuug.dk \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmichael-raid@edgeofthenet.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).