From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Janek Kozicki Subject: Re: raid1 on HDD + RAM ? Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:36:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20080930213617.0da1f315@szpak> References: <20080930174926.5fdad7f1@szpak> <20080930182129.GA28669@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080930182129.GA28669@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linux RAID Mailing List List-Id: linux-raid.ids Robin Hill said: (by the date of Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:21:29 +0100) > I don't see why it wouldn't be possible. I would think you'd get the > same performance leaving the RAM for caching though - that way anything > you _are_ actually reading/writing will be cached and the RAM is still > available for applications if needed. yes, I know. But in my case this won't work. This data which I want quickly is seldom accessed therefore it will not be cached. -- Janek Kozicki |