From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wilhelm Meier Subject: Re: mdadm --incremental /dev/md?? instead of /dev/md/d?? Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 07:57:31 +0100 Message-ID: <200812010757.31539.wilhelm.meier@fh-kl.de> References: <200811301543.47003.wilhelm.meier@fh-kl.de> <5733f4fe1f2b309195c0c2a328942eff.squirrel@neil.brown.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5733f4fe1f2b309195c0c2a328942eff.squirrel@neil.brown.name> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: NeilBrown Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Am Montag 01 Dezember 2008 schrieb NeilBrown: > On Mon, December 1, 2008 1:43 am, Wilhelm Meier wrote: > > How can I switch the naming scheme for the mdadm incremental-mode > > using /dev/md42 instead of /dev/md/d42 for adding a device or > > constructing an array with a minor-number 42? > > I thought it did default to /dev/md42 > Do you have something like > CREATE auto=mdp > in /etc/mdadm.conf?? no. auto=yes > Making that "auto=md" might fix it. have to check this later > > > mdadm --version: 2.6.2 > > That is about 18 months old now. An upgrade might be a good idea. Oh yes. But this is already the debian-etch-backports version. The debian-etch version is 2.5.8 (missing --incremental) > > NeilBrown > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Wilhelm