From: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Adding a component to an array which has changed size
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:26:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081204122635.GP32420@arachsys.com> (raw)
The amount of space reserved in each component for an internal bitmap
depends on the size of the component. If I have (say) a raid5 arrray of size
50GB that used to be a raid5 array of size 1GB, and I fail one of the slots
and add in a new replacement, the new slot needs to be bigger than all the
existing ones because a larger space is reserved by mdadm for the internal
bitmap.
3# mdadm --version && uname -sv
mdadm - v2.6.7 - 6th June 2008
Linux 2.6.27.7 #2 SMP Wed Dec 3 12:00:03 GMT 2008
3# mdadm --fail /dev/md127 /dev/mapper/slot.51000.1
mdadm: set /dev/mapper/slot.51000.1 faulty in /dev/md127
3# mdadm --remove /dev/md127 /dev/mapper/slot.51000.1
mdadm: hot removed /dev/mapper/slot.51000.1
3# # wipe superblock so this is a new slot rather than a re-add...
3# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/mapper/slot.51000.1 bs=1M count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
3# mdadm --add /dev/md127 /dev/mapper/slot.51000.1
mdadm: /dev/mapper/slot.51000.1 not large enough to join array
3# mdadm --examine /dev/mapper/slot.51000.0
/dev/mapper/slot.51000.0:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.1
Feature Map : 0x0
Array UUID : 61a6b9ac:4b38148f:c0c0837e:1c34783f
Name : 3:shelf.51000
Creation Time : Thu Dec 4 11:21:49 2008
Raid Level : raid1
Raid Devices : 2
Avail Dev Size : 104857584 (50.00 GiB 53.69 GB)
Array Size : 104857584 (50.00 GiB 53.69 GB)
Data Offset : 16 sectors
Super Offset : 0 sectors
State : active
Device UUID : f8c6dcec:add24452:267858ec:617382cd
Update Time : Thu Dec 4 12:07:22 2008
Checksum : 1e90683 - correct
Events : 19
Array Slot : 0 (0, failed)
Array State : U_ 1 failed
Is there any way either to persuade mdadm to take the bitmap size for from the
existing components, or ideally to override the bitmap size when creating
arrays and adding components so I can just choose a constant size for all our
automatically generated arrays, given that the arrays will vary in size over
their lifetimes?
Best wishes,
Chris.
next reply other threads:[~2008-12-04 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-04 12:26 Chris Webb [this message]
2008-12-04 21:21 ` Adding a component to an array which has changed size NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081204122635.GP32420@arachsys.com \
--to=chris@arachsys.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).