public inbox for linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bryan Mesich <bryan.mesich@ndsu.edu>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Growing RAID1 array with bitmaps enabled
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:53:34 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081219145334.GC29150@atlantis.cc.ndsu.NoDak.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18763.10505.701483.494901@notabene.brown>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3307 bytes --]

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 03:54:33PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:

[snip...]
>  
> > 1) Does the superblock increase in size when the array is grown 
> > to make room for a larger bitmap?  (This doesn't seem possible 
> > to me, particularly if using a v1.1 or v1.2 superblock).
> 
> The bitmap does not live in the superblock.  It lives near the
> superblock. For 0.90, the superblock is 4K in size, and lives at 
> least 60K from the end of the device.  The bitmap lives in that 60K.
> 
> For 1.0, the superblock is 1K in size and lives between 8K and 12K
> from the end of the device.  There is usually some space reserved
> before the superblock which is not used for data.  The bitmap lives in
> one of these spaces.
> 
> For 1.1 and 1.2, the superblock is 1K in size and lives near the start
> of the device.  There is usually some space reserved after the
> superblock and before the data.  The bitmap is stored there.
>
 
Thanks for the explanation and correction. 

[snip...]

> > With this in mind (and the adage that patches are welcome), has there 
> > been any interest in being able to use a write-intent bitmap for this 
> > kind of use case?  The benefit of this functionality would keep me 
> > from eating two _full_ re-syncs on the array when growing the block 
> > devices.
> 
> I think you misunderstand.  There is no need for a full resync.
> You simply
> 
>   mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --bitmap none
>   mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --size max
>   mdadm --wait /dev/md0
>   mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --bitmap internal
> 
> The "--wait" will wait while the array syncs the data from 40GB to
> 100GB.

Before I can grow the array (using your example), I need to fail
and remove the devices from the array so they can be grown on the
FC target.  Something like this:

    # Fail and remove the device that is to be grown
    mdadm /dev/md0 --fail /dev/sdc1
    mdadm /dev/md0 --remove /dev/sdc1

    # Remove the device from the system
    echo '1' >| /sys/block/sdc/device/delete

Now that the exported device has been removed from the initiator,
I can grow the volume on the target.

    # Scan for the block device that is now 100GB
    echo "- - -" >| /sys/class/scsi_host/host3/scan

With the system now seeing the larger block device, I can resize
the partition (I'll need to use v1.1 or v1.2 suberblock to
prevent the superblock from getting clobbered).

    # Add device back into the array
    mdadm /dev/md0 --add /dev/sdc1

This is where I would like to use a write-intent bitmap.  When the 
re-sync finishes, I would do the same to the other device (and
hopefully use the bitmap for its re-sync).   

Your email about the bitmap not growing has me a bit gun shy.  Can 
I use a write-intent bitmap in this situation without shooting 
myself in the foot?

After both devices have been grown, I would grow the array just
as you pointed out in your example:

   mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --bitmap none
   mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --size max
   mdadm --wait /dev/md0
   mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --bitmap internal

If I understand you correctly, its the "mdadm --grow /dev/md0
--size max" that will bite me if I have a bitmap enabled.  Thus,
you removed the bitmap from the array while growing.

Thanks in advance,

Bryan

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-19 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-19  4:07 Growing RAID1 array with bitmaps enabled Bryan Mesich
2008-12-19  4:54 ` Neil Brown
2008-12-19 14:53   ` Bryan Mesich [this message]
2008-12-24  0:41     ` Neil Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081219145334.GC29150@atlantis.cc.ndsu.NoDak.edu \
    --to=bryan.mesich@ndsu.edu \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox