linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@disenchant.net>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Read errors and SMART tests
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:00:44 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081220013043.GM1749@cubit> (raw)

Hi,

Just a quick question about SMART tests :-

I have a Samsung drive returning read errors, e.g.:

Dec 20 08:59:24 hermes kernel: ata4.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
Dec 20 08:59:24 hermes kernel: ata4.00: irq_stat 0x40000008
Dec 20 08:59:24 hermes kernel: ata4.00: cmd 60/80:00:3f:0e:50/00:00:24:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 65536 in
Dec 20 08:59:24 hermes kernel:          res 41/40:00:61:0e:50/00:00:24:00:00/40 Emask 0x409 (media error) <F>
Dec 20 08:59:24 hermes kernel: ata4.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
Dec 20 08:59:24 hermes kernel: ata4.00: error: { UNC }
Dec 20 08:59:24 hermes kernel: ata4.00: configured for UDMA/133
Dec 20 08:59:24 hermes kernel: ata4: EH complete
Dec 20 08:59:24 hermes kernel: sd 3:0:0:0: [sdd] 1953525168 512-byte hardware sectors (1000205 MB)
Dec 20 08:59:24 hermes kernel: sd 3:0:0:0: [sdd] Write Protect is off
Dec 20 08:59:24 hermes kernel: sd 3:0:0:0: [sdd] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
Dec 20 08:59:24 hermes kernel: sd 3:0:0:0: [sdd] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA

So, I ran the short (and long) selftest and it showed read
failures. Then I put in a new drive to replace it and ran the short
selftest again - this one is showing read errors also:

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART Self-test log structure revision number 0
Warning: ATA Specification requires self-test log structure revision number = 1
Num  Test_Description    Status                  Remaining  LifeTime(hours)  LBA_of_first_error
# 1  Short offline       Completed: read failure       20%      2572         294961
# 2  Short offline       Aborted by host               20%      2572         -

I'm guessing this is just bad luck, i.e. drives from the same bad
batch. Erm, so my question - Am I right in assuming that the SMART
self test is not influenced in any way by bad cables, etc.? If the
drive returns read errors on it's self-test the error is within the
drive itself, right?

Thanks,
Kevin.

             reply	other threads:[~2008-12-20  1:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-20  1:30 Kevin Shanahan [this message]
2008-12-20  4:13 ` Read errors and SMART tests David Lethe
2008-12-20  5:22   ` Kevin Shanahan
2008-12-20  6:54     ` David Lethe
2008-12-20  9:09       ` Kevin Shanahan
2008-12-20 21:46         ` David Greaves
2009-01-14 20:59     ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081220013043.GM1749@cubit \
    --to=kmshanah@disenchant.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).