From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Performance question
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:20:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090117182040.GA13355@lazy.lzy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f8901c978ce$f6cb6bde$3d01a8c0@exchange.rackspace.com>
Hi,
thanks for the answer.
Well what I would like to have is exactly a configuration
hint, eventually benchmarks and the like.
The requirements are: two disks, redundacy.
The question is: what configuration is reccommended
in view of performances (or "what can be achieved").
Is that specific enough?
Thanks again,
bye,
pg
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:11:00PM -0600, David Lethe wrote:
> All we know is that you use 2 disks and md. This is like posting to a TCP/IP architecture group and saying you have a network connection and want performance advice. Read up, supply full config info, run benchmarks, then ask specific questions. GI=GO.
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: "Piergiorgio Sartor" <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>
> Subj: Performance question
> Date: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:18 am
> Size: 874 bytes
> To: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'll have to setup some machines with two HDs (each)
> in order to get some redundancy.
>
> Reading the MD features I noticed there are several
> possibilities to create a mirror.
> I was wondering which one offer the best perfomances
> and/or what are the compromises to accept between
> the different solutions.
>
> One possibility is a classic RAID-1 mirror.
> Another is a RAID-10 far.
> There would also be the RAID-10 near, but I guess
> this is equivalent to RAID-1.
>
> Any suggestion on which method offers higher "speed"?
> Or there are other possibilities with 2 HDs (keeping
> the redundancy, of course)?
>
> Thanks a lot in advance,
>
> bye,
>
> --
>
> piergiorgio
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
piergiorgio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-17 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-17 18:11 Performance question David Lethe
2009-01-17 18:20 ` Piergiorgio Sartor [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-17 17:18 Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-01-17 18:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-01-17 22:08 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-01-19 18:12 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-01-21 0:15 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-01-21 1:05 ` Richard Scobie
2009-01-21 19:14 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-01-21 20:15 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-01-21 20:26 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090117182040.GA13355@lazy.lzy \
--to=piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).