linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Keld Jørn Simonsen" <keld@dkuug.dk>
To: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID-10 unbalanced reads
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:11:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090209231138.GB13450@rap.rap.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090209202728.GA11996@lazy.lzy>

On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:27:28PM +0100, Piergiorgio Sartor wrote:
> Hi all.
> 
> I've setup a system with two RAID volumes.
> One is a small RAID-1, /dev/md0, with the /boot
> content, the other is a RAID-10 f2, with LVM,
> for the rest of the system.
> 
> I just noticed that /dev/sdb, which is not the
> boot disk, I assume, has more reads than /dev/sda.
> Writes are the same, here is the output of "iostat":
> 
> Device:            tps   Blk_read/s   Blk_wrtn/s   Blk_read   Blk_wrtn
> sda              10.08       183.15       408.74     755018    1684972
> sda1              0.04         1.24         0.02       5118         66
> sda2             10.03       181.71       408.72     749071    1684880
> sdb              10.49       187.64       408.74     773532    1684972
> sdb1              0.03         1.17         0.02       4837         66
> sdb2             10.44       186.26       408.72     767832    1684880
> md1              62.95       367.26       391.79    1513976    1615112
> md0               0.02         0.18         0.00        724          8
> 
> Note that sda1 has more reads than sdb1.
> This is possibly due to the fact that it is
> used during boot.
> 
> What is strange, is sdb2, which has by far
> more reads than sda2. Both belong to /dev/md1.
> 
> Note also the /dev/sdb is the slowest of the
> two drives.
> 
> Is that somehow normal?
> If not, is it possible to find out what or
> why the reads are unbalanced?

What kernel are you using?
Before 2.6.25 you could have differences in usage.

Anyway, I think the difference is too small to be of inportance
for the performance. Or did you notice a difference?

best regards
keld

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-09 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-09 20:27 RAID-10 unbalanced reads Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-02-09 23:11 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen [this message]
2009-02-10 19:07   ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-02-23 22:15   ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-02-23 22:52     ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-02-23 23:24       ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-02-23 23:37         ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-02-24  9:00         ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-02-24 19:16           ` Piergiorgio Sartor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090209231138.GB13450@rap.rap.dk \
    --to=keld@dkuug.dk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).