From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/18] md: never clear bit from the write-intent bitmap when the array is degraded.
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:10:10 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090212031010.23983.36919.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090212031009.23983.14496.stgit@notabene.brown>
It is safe to clear a bit from the write-intent bitmap for a raid1
when if we know the data has been written to all devices, which is
what the current test does.
But it is not always safe to update the 'events_cleared' counter in
that case. This is one request could complete successfully after some
other request has partially failed.
So simply disable the clearing and updating of events_cleared whenever
the array is degraded. This might end up not clearing some bits that
could safely be cleared, but it is safest approach.
Note that the bug fixed here did not risk corrupting data by letting
the array get out-of-sync. Rather it meant that when a device is
removed and re-added to the array, it might incorrectly require a full
recovery rather than just recovering based on the bitmap.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
drivers/md/bitmap.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bitmap.c b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
index 7199437..be29937 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bitmap.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
@@ -1306,6 +1306,9 @@ void bitmap_endwrite(struct bitmap *bitmap, sector_t offset, unsigned long secto
PRINTK(KERN_DEBUG "dec write-behind count %d/%d\n",
atomic_read(&bitmap->behind_writes), bitmap->max_write_behind);
}
+ if (bitmap->mddev->degraded)
+ /* Never clear bits or update events_cleared when degraded */
+ success = 0;
while (sectors) {
int blocks;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-12 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-12 3:10 [PATCH 00/18] Assorted md patches headed for 2.6.30 NeilBrown
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 05/18] md: Make mddev->size sector-based NeilBrown
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 04/18] md: be more consistent about setting WriteMostly flag when adding a drive to an array NeilBrown
2009-02-12 3:10 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 08/18] md/raid5: change raid5_compute_sector and stripe_to_pdidx to take a 'previous' argument NeilBrown
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 02/18] md: write bitmap information to devices that are undergoing recovery NeilBrown
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 06/18] md: Represent raid device size in sectors NeilBrown
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 07/18] md/raid5: simplify interface for init_stripe and get_active_stripe NeilBrown
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 03/18] md: occasionally checkpoint drive recovery to reduce duplicate effort after a crash NeilBrown
2009-02-12 17:26 ` John Stoffel
2009-02-13 16:20 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-02-13 16:34 ` Jon Nelson
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 15/18] md: hopefully enable suspend/resume of md devices NeilBrown
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 10/18] md/raid5: simplify raid5_compute_sector interface NeilBrown
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 09/18] md/raid6: remove expectation that Q device is immediately after P device NeilBrown
2009-02-12 16:56 ` Andre Noll
2009-02-13 22:19 ` Dan Williams
2009-02-16 0:08 ` Neil Brown
2009-02-13 16:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-02-16 5:15 ` Neil Brown
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 14/18] md: md_unregister_thread should cope with being passed NULL NeilBrown
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 11/18] md/raid5: Add support for new layouts for raid5 and raid6 NeilBrown
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 17/18] md: add ->takeover method for raid5 to be able to take over raid1 NeilBrown
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 12/18] md/raid5: finish support for DDF/raid6 NeilBrown
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 18/18] md/raid5: allow layout/chunksize to be changed on an active2-drive raid5 NeilBrown
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 16/18] md: add ->takeover method to support changing the personality managing an array NeilBrown
2009-02-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 13/18] md/raid5: refactor raid5 "run" NeilBrown
2009-02-12 8:11 ` [PATCH 00/18] Assorted md patches headed for 2.6.30 Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-02-12 9:13 ` Steve Fairbairn
2009-02-12 9:46 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-02-12 10:52 ` NeilBrown
2009-02-12 11:16 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-02-12 10:53 ` Julian Cowley
2009-02-13 16:54 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-02-16 5:35 ` Neil Brown
2009-02-16 17:31 ` Nagilum
2009-02-12 22:57 ` Dan Williams
2009-02-13 16:56 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-02-12 9:21 ` NeilBrown
2009-02-12 9:53 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-02-12 10:45 ` NeilBrown
2009-02-12 11:11 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-02-12 15:28 ` Wil Reichert
2009-02-12 17:44 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-02-12 9:42 ` Farkas Levente
2009-02-12 10:40 ` NeilBrown
2009-02-12 11:17 ` Farkas Levente
2009-02-13 17:02 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090212031010.23983.36919.stgit@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).