linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>
To: "Keld Jørn Simonsen" <keld@dkuug.dk>
Cc: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID-10 unbalanced reads
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:15:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090223221532.GA23542@lazy.lzy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090209231138.GB13450@rap.rap.dk>

Hi,

some updates.

> > Device:            tps   Blk_read/s   Blk_wrtn/s   Blk_read   Blk_wrtn
> > sda              10.08       183.15       408.74     755018    1684972
> > sda1              0.04         1.24         0.02       5118         66
> > sda2             10.03       181.71       408.72     749071    1684880
> > sdb              10.49       187.64       408.74     773532    1684972
> > sdb1              0.03         1.17         0.02       4837         66
> > sdb2             10.44       186.26       408.72     767832    1684880
> > md1              62.95       367.26       391.79    1513976    1615112
> > md0               0.02         0.18         0.00        724          8
[...]
> Anyway, I think the difference is too small to be of inportance
> for the performance. Or did you notice a difference?

What about this:

Device:            tps   Blk_read/s   Blk_wrtn/s   Blk_read   Blk_wrtn
sda               5.43        64.15        71.33     598692     665656
sda1              0.01         0.15         0.01       1421         64
sda2              5.42        63.95        71.32     596823     665592
sdb               6.22       219.19        71.33    2045590     665656
sdb1              0.29        67.16         0.01     626774         64
sdb2              5.93       151.87        71.32    1417344     665592
md1              12.56       129.09        57.25    1204696     534320
md0               0.01         0.08         0.00        724          8

Now, I do not recall any particular reason why
it should be like this (i.e. no resync or else),
but it seems to me a bit too unbalanced.

Could it be a problem with /dev/sdb?
I run smart long tests weekly, but nothing special
was reported, until now.

bye,

-- 

piergiorgio

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-23 22:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-09 20:27 RAID-10 unbalanced reads Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-02-09 23:11 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-02-10 19:07   ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-02-23 22:15   ` Piergiorgio Sartor [this message]
2009-02-23 22:52     ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-02-23 23:24       ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-02-23 23:37         ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-02-24  9:00         ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-02-24 19:16           ` Piergiorgio Sartor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090223221532.GA23542@lazy.lzy \
    --to=piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de \
    --cc=keld@dkuug.dk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).