From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>
To: "Keld Jørn Simonsen" <keld@dkuug.dk>
Cc: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID-10 unbalanced reads
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:15:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090223221532.GA23542@lazy.lzy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090209231138.GB13450@rap.rap.dk>
Hi,
some updates.
> > Device: tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn
> > sda 10.08 183.15 408.74 755018 1684972
> > sda1 0.04 1.24 0.02 5118 66
> > sda2 10.03 181.71 408.72 749071 1684880
> > sdb 10.49 187.64 408.74 773532 1684972
> > sdb1 0.03 1.17 0.02 4837 66
> > sdb2 10.44 186.26 408.72 767832 1684880
> > md1 62.95 367.26 391.79 1513976 1615112
> > md0 0.02 0.18 0.00 724 8
[...]
> Anyway, I think the difference is too small to be of inportance
> for the performance. Or did you notice a difference?
What about this:
Device: tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn
sda 5.43 64.15 71.33 598692 665656
sda1 0.01 0.15 0.01 1421 64
sda2 5.42 63.95 71.32 596823 665592
sdb 6.22 219.19 71.33 2045590 665656
sdb1 0.29 67.16 0.01 626774 64
sdb2 5.93 151.87 71.32 1417344 665592
md1 12.56 129.09 57.25 1204696 534320
md0 0.01 0.08 0.00 724 8
Now, I do not recall any particular reason why
it should be like this (i.e. no resync or else),
but it seems to me a bit too unbalanced.
Could it be a problem with /dev/sdb?
I run smart long tests weekly, but nothing special
was reported, until now.
bye,
--
piergiorgio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-23 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-09 20:27 RAID-10 unbalanced reads Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-02-09 23:11 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-02-10 19:07 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-02-23 22:15 ` Piergiorgio Sartor [this message]
2009-02-23 22:52 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-02-23 23:24 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-02-23 23:37 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-02-24 9:00 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-02-24 19:16 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090223221532.GA23542@lazy.lzy \
--to=piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de \
--cc=keld@dkuug.dk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).