From: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: neilb@suse.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
ed.ciechanowski@intel.com, jacek.danecki@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] md: add 'size' as a personality method
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 17:15:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090306161551.GI32416@skl-net.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090306002448.9882.88409.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1166 bytes --]
On 17:24, Dan Williams wrote:
> +raid10_size(mddev_t *mddev, sector_t sectors, int raid_disks)
> +{
> + sector_t size;
> + int chunk_shift;
> + conf_t *conf = mddev_to_conf(mddev);
> + int chunk_size = mddev->chunk_size;
> +
> + if (!raid_disks)
> + raid_disks = mddev->raid_disks;
> + if (!sectors)
> + sectors = mddev->dev_sectors;
> +
> + chunk_shift = ffz(~chunk_size) - 9;
> + size = sectors >> chunk_shift;
> + sector_div(size, conf->far_copies);
> + size = size * raid_disks;
> + sector_div(size, conf->near_copies);
> +
> + return size << chunk_shift;
> +}
Is there a reason you are recomputing chunk_shift instead of using
conf->chunk_shift.
> +static sector_t
> +raid5_size(mddev_t *mddev, sector_t sectors, int raid_disks)
> +{
> + raid5_conf_t *conf = mddev_to_conf(mddev);
> + int chunk_size = mddev->chunk_size;
> +
> + if (!sectors)
> + sectors = mddev->dev_sectors;
> + if (!raid_disks)
> + raid_disks = conf->previous_raid_disks;
> +
> + sectors &= ~(chunk_size / 512 - 1);
Don't we need a cast to sector_t here?
Andre
--
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-06 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-06 0:24 [PATCH 0/3] Support setting the array size from userspace Dan Williams
2009-03-06 0:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] md: add 'size' as a personality method Dan Williams
2009-03-06 16:15 ` Andre Noll [this message]
2009-03-06 17:55 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-06 0:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] md: centralize ->array_sectors modifications Dan Williams
2009-03-06 0:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] md: 'array_size' sysfs attribute Dan Williams
2009-03-06 16:15 ` Andre Noll
2009-03-06 18:20 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-07 6:28 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-09 10:12 ` Andre Noll
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090306161551.GI32416@skl-net.de \
--to=maan@systemlinux.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
--cc=jacek.danecki@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).