From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dexter Filmore <Dexter.Filmore@gmx.de>
Subject: What hardware for RAID5? (PCIe controller or fast onboard)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:33:39 +0100
Message-ID: <200903181833.39469.Dexter.Filmore@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1956672.C7kuyzZORb";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

--nextPart1956672.C7kuyzZORb
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

I want to upgrade server hardware here, currently I have 5 Samsungs (sATA I=
I)=20
sitting on the onboard controller of an Asus K8N-E Socket754 board.
I guess the controller chips are both connected via PCI hence performance=20
isn't really hot.

Basically I need either a board with at least 6x sATA-II attached via PCIe =
or=20
a "dumb" PCIe 4x or 8x controller card.

Any recommendations?

Dex

=2D-=20
=2D----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d--(+)@ s-:+ a C++++ UL++ P+>++ L+++>++++ E-- W++ N o? K-
w--(---) !O M+ V- PS+ PE Y++ PGP t++(---)@ 5 X+(++) R+(++) tv--(+)@=20
b++(+++) DI+++ D- G++ e* h>++ r* y?
=2D-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de

--nextPart1956672.C7kuyzZORb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBJwTBzm6TdMk9WhQ0RAmmHAJ9VgtZjODXsEEjHoS744cWMNKRJogCeL3En
SS08OaR87W9tvAxhOCQuW5s=
=KmOs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1956672.C7kuyzZORb--