From: Dave Fisher <davef@davefisher.co.uk>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID 10 array won't assemble ... spare ... metadata - Disappointing Report Back
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:13:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090418201328.GC18440@davefisher.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18921.1283.548260.293728@notabene.brown>
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 08:38:59AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> So:
>
> mdadm -S /dev/md1
> mdadm -A /dev/md1 -fv /dev/sd[abcde]4
>
> and report the result.
Output transcribed by hand:
mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md1
mdadm: /dev/sda4 is identified as a member of /dev/md1 slot 0
mdadm: /dev/sdb4 is identified as a member of /dev/md1 slot 1
mdadm: /dev/sdc4 is identified as a member of /dev/md1 slot 2
mdadm: /dev/sdd4 is identified as a member of /dev/md1 slot 3
mdadm: /dev/sde4 is identified as a member of /dev/md1 slot 4
mdadm: forcing event count in /dev/sdb4(1) from 219 upto 221
But when I ran mdadm -E on each of the partitions the counts were
competely unchanged, i.e. sd[bcde]4 were still all at 219.
sda4 was still at 221
Everything else looked exactly the same, including the summary tables at
the end.
Any thoughts?
Do I need to start/run the array to affect the changes?
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-18 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-17 14:14 RAID 10 array won't assemble, all devices marked spare, confusing mdadm metadata Dave Fisher
2009-04-17 22:38 ` Neil Brown
2009-04-18 14:43 ` Dave Fisher
2009-04-18 20:13 ` Dave Fisher [this message]
2009-04-18 20:20 ` RAID 10 array won't assemble ... spare ... metadata - Correction Disappointing Report Back Dave Fisher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090418201328.GC18440@davefisher.co.uk \
--to=davef@davefisher.co.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).