From: Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] mdadm ignoring homehost?
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:51:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090423055132.GA29487@maude.comedia.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9A77DB27-C12A-4BA2-94C4-D59B7DAFF32C@redhat.com>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 09:20:49PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2009, at 12:06 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 20:15 +0200, Piergiorgio Sartor wrote:
>>
>>> This might be a Fedora 10 issue, so maybe Doug would like
>>> to comment.
>>>
>>> After reboot, someone, I guess udev, tries to automagically
>>> start a RAID, so it assembles /dev/md_d127 with one of the
>>> two components of /dev/md/boot (randomly, it seems).
>>> Later, when /dev/md/boot is assembled, one drive is "busy",
>>> because it belongs to /dev/md_d127, and the array is put
>>> together degraded, i.e. with the other disk only.
>>
>> Just a "me too". I also started seeing this after upgrading to fedora
>> 10. I had to create a startup script to stop md_d0 and reassemble
>> everything else.
>
>
> Yeah, I found the cause for this while working on F11. The problem is a
> race condition between udev and a call to mdadm -As in the rc.sysinit. For
> F11, I solved this by making udev not process devices using incremental
> mode if we are still in the rc.sysinit script. You can change
> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-mdadm.rules (I think that's the right name, it might
> be slightly off) to read something like this:
>
> # This file causes block devices with Linux RAID (mdadm) signatures to
> # automatically cause mdadm to be run.
> # See udev(8) for syntax
>
> SUBSYSTEM=="block", ACTION=="add", ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="linux_raid_member", \
> IMPORT{program}="/sbin/mdadm --examine --export $tempnode", \
> RUN+="/bin/bash -c '[ ! -f /dev/.in_sysinit ] && mdadm -I $env{DEVNAME}'"
>
>
i believe i saw this as well, but not at startup, it was when i manually
run mdadm -As, so while your hack to prevent udev from assembling
devices while in sysinit may not be a full solution.
my solution was "rm -f /etc/udev/rules.d/70-mdadm.rules",
works like a charm :P
probably the best solution is preventing concurrent mdadm rules with a
lock.
Regards,
L.
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-23 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-24 16:57 mdadm ignoring homehost? Jon Nelson
2009-04-01 15:15 ` Jon Nelson
2009-04-01 22:46 ` Neil Brown
2009-04-06 14:47 ` [Patch] " Doug Ledford
2009-04-06 19:33 ` Luca Berra
2009-04-17 3:49 ` Neil Brown
2009-04-17 7:08 ` Gabor Gombas
2009-04-20 5:23 ` Neil Brown
2009-04-21 6:34 ` Gabor Gombas
2009-04-21 7:06 ` Luca Berra
2009-04-17 18:17 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-17 18:40 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-04-18 7:54 ` Luca Berra
2009-04-18 8:36 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-04-18 10:19 ` Luca Berra
2009-04-18 13:06 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-04-20 5:58 ` Neil Brown
2009-04-20 12:29 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-20 18:17 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-04-20 19:49 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-20 20:04 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-04-20 21:18 ` Luca Berra
2009-04-20 21:13 ` Luca Berra
2009-04-20 21:24 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-04-20 23:47 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-21 0:00 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-21 8:57 ` Michal Soltys
2009-04-21 6:29 ` Luca Berra
2009-04-21 18:15 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-04-22 16:06 ` Andrew Burgess
2009-04-23 1:20 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-23 5:51 ` Luca Berra [this message]
2009-04-23 6:09 ` Luca Berra
2009-04-23 11:05 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-23 21:31 ` Luca Berra
2009-04-24 16:46 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-24 19:15 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-04-26 11:52 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-26 12:14 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-04-26 12:58 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-04-26 18:06 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-26 19:08 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-04-26 21:37 ` Michal Soltys
2009-04-18 14:34 ` Andrew Burgess
2009-04-18 8:12 ` Luca Berra
2009-04-18 8:44 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-04-18 13:35 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-18 13:52 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-04-18 14:50 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-18 14:48 ` Jon Nelson
2009-04-20 6:08 ` Neil Brown
2009-04-20 12:26 ` Luca Berra
2009-04-20 12:36 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-18 13:58 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-04-20 7:23 ` Neil Brown
2009-04-20 13:15 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-21 6:54 ` Neil Brown
2009-05-11 6:47 ` Neil Brown
2009-04-01 22:47 ` Michal Soltys
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090423055132.GA29487@maude.comedia.it \
--to=bluca@comedia.it \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).