From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andre Noll Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] async_xor: permit callers to pass in a 'dma/page scribble' region Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:55:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20090525075503.GR11504@skl-net.de> References: <20090519005647.4104.81119.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> <20090519005946.4104.28803.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> <20090520080818.GT6403@skl-net.de> <20090520190928.GL11504@skl-net.de> <20090522082946.GP11504@skl-net.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6nfUOKxk8V1TQsEu" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Williams Cc: Neil Brown , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --6nfUOKxk8V1TQsEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10:25, Dan Williams wrote: > Strictly speaking your "-by" line in this scenario should be either > Acked-by or Reviewed-by. Signed-off-by is reserved for people who had > the patch in their possession on its way to mainline. Any heartburn > if I use Reviewed-by? No heartburns, just use Reviewed-by. Thanks Andre --=20 The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe --6nfUOKxk8V1TQsEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFKGk7XWto1QDEAkw8RAjnaAJ9UNiEZNFTa+l6yhrBKKd4N/7+uyQCfbGGX v0BibnFpeD+AHMVgO9lHunQ= =YKoR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6nfUOKxk8V1TQsEu--