From: Kyle Liddell <kyle@foobox.homelinux.net>
To: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: forcing check of RAID1 arrays causes lockup
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 05:17:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090528091726.GA8067@athlon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A1C986A.7040403@gmail.com>
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:33:30PM -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> Not what you are going to want to hear but badly designed hardware.
>
> On a machine I had with 4 disks (2 on a build-in via, 2 on other
> ports--either a built-in promise, or a sil pci card), when the 2
> build-in via sata ports got used heavily at the same times as any
...
> It appeared to me as designed the via chipsets (And think your
> chipset is pretty close to the one I was using) did not appear to deal
> with with high levels of traffic to several devices at once, and would
> become unstable.
>
> Once I figured out the issue, I could duplicate it in under 5 minutes,
> and the only working solution was to not use the via ports.
>
> My mb at the time was a Asus k8v se deluxe with a K8T800 chipset, and
> so long as it was not heavily used it was stable, but under heavy use
> it was junk.
That does sound like my problem, and the hardware is similar. However, I don't think it's the VIA controller that's the problem here: I moved the two drives off the on-board VIA controller and placed them as slaves on the Promise card. I was able to install fedora, which was an improvement, but once installed, I was able to bring the system down again by forcing a check. I've got a spare Promise IDE controller, so I tried swapping it out, with no change.
I suppose it's a weird hardware bug, although it still is strange that certain combinations of kernels (which makes a little sense) + distributions (which makes no sense) will work. I just went back to debian on the machine, and it works fine.
I'm trying to reproduce the problem on another machine, but I'm not too hopeful.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-28 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-26 23:45 forcing check of RAID1 arrays causes lockup kyle
2009-05-27 1:33 ` Roger Heflin
2009-05-28 9:17 ` Kyle Liddell [this message]
2009-05-28 12:42 ` Redeeman
2009-05-28 23:25 ` Roger Heflin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090528091726.GA8067@athlon \
--to=kyle@foobox.homelinux.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogerheflin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).