linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kyle Liddell <kyle@foobox.homelinux.net>
To: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: forcing check of RAID1 arrays causes lockup
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 05:17:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090528091726.GA8067@athlon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A1C986A.7040403@gmail.com>

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:33:30PM -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> Not what you are going to want to hear but badly designed hardware.
> 
> On a machine I had with 4 disks (2 on a build-in via, 2 on other 
> ports--either a built-in promise, or a sil pci card), when the 2 
> build-in via sata ports got used heavily at the same times as any 
...
>    It appeared to me as designed the via chipsets (And think your 
> chipset is pretty close to the one I was using) did not appear to deal 
> with with high levels of traffic to several devices at once, and would 
> become unstable.
> 
> Once I figured out the issue, I could duplicate it in under 5 minutes, 
> and the only working solution was to not use the via ports.
> 
> My mb at the time was a Asus k8v se deluxe with a K8T800 chipset, and 
> so long as it was not heavily used it was stable, but under heavy use 
> it was junk.

That does sound like my problem, and the hardware is similar.  However, I don't think it's the VIA controller that's the problem here:  I moved the two drives off the on-board VIA controller and placed them as slaves on the Promise card.  I was able to install fedora, which was an improvement, but once installed, I was able to bring the system down again by forcing a check.  I've got a spare Promise IDE controller, so I tried swapping it out, with no change.

I suppose it's a weird hardware bug, although it still is strange that certain combinations of kernels (which makes a little sense) + distributions (which makes no sense) will work.  I just went back to debian on the machine, and it works fine.  

I'm trying to reproduce the problem on another machine, but I'm not too hopeful.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-28  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-26 23:45 forcing check of RAID1 arrays causes lockup kyle
2009-05-27  1:33 ` Roger Heflin
2009-05-28  9:17   ` Kyle Liddell [this message]
2009-05-28 12:42     ` Redeeman
2009-05-28 23:25       ` Roger Heflin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090528091726.GA8067@athlon \
    --to=kyle@foobox.homelinux.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rogerheflin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).