From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: <linux-raid.vger.kernel.org@atu.cjb.net>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFJBSUQtNiBtZGFkbSBkaXNrcyBvdXQgb2Ygc3luYyBpc3N1ZSAobm8gc3VjY2Vzcyk=?=
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:24:37 -0600
Message-ID: <200906130924.n5D9OgZ4058257@cjb.net>
References: <200906130918.n5D9Ipt5057035@cjb.net>
Reply-To: <linux-raid.vger.kernel.org@atu.cjb.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <200906130918.n5D9Ipt5057035@cjb.net>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

> The individual disks still have confusing/conflicting information, each
> disk showing different states of failed and active for the various disks,
> as it did before I reassembled it.

Correction: they did have the old data listed for a while, but have now
updated themselves so all disks show the same two missing disks, and the
rest as active.

 - S.A.