From: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
To: raz ben yehuda <raziebe@gmail.com>
Cc: linux raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Subject:[PATCH 001:013]: md: Raid0 reshape
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:12:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090617081238.GB6403@skl-net.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245189112.3478.94.camel@raz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1624 bytes --]
On 00:51, raz ben yehuda wrote:
> md assumes that personality has all its membes of the same
> size,A fact that is incorrect for raid0.
>
> md.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Signed-off-by: razb <raziebe@gmail.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 0f11fd1..e14fb90 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -5683,7 +5683,8 @@ static void status_resync(struct seq_file *seq, mddev_t * mddev)
> max_sectors = mddev->resync_max_sectors;
> else
> max_sectors = mddev->dev_sectors;
> -
> + if (mddev->level == 0)
> + max_sectors = mddev->resync_max_sectors;
> /*
> * Should not happen.
> */
> @@ -6280,7 +6281,13 @@ void md_do_sync(mddev_t *mddev)
> rdev->recovery_offset < j)
> j = rdev->recovery_offset;
> }
> -
> + /*
> + * raid0 members may not be of the same size,use array_size.
> + */
> + if (mddev->level == 0) {
> + max_sectors = mddev->array_sectors;
> + j = mddev->recovery_cp;
> + }
> printk(KERN_INFO "md: %s of RAID array %s\n", desc, mdname(mddev));
> printk(KERN_INFO "md: minimum _guaranteed_ speed:"
> " %d KB/sec/disk.\n", speed_min(mddev));
Hm, we want to get rid of personality-dependent code in md.c, so new
code should never check mddev->level. In the first hunk I think it
would be possible to check if pers->sync_request is NULL.
Is the second hunk really necessary? AFAICS md_do_sync() won't be
called for raid0 anyway.
Regards
Andre
--
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-17 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-16 21:51 Subject:[PATCH 001:013]: md: Raid0 reshape raz ben yehuda
2009-06-16 23:24 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-06-17 10:25 ` raz ben yehuda
2009-06-17 13:30 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-06-17 8:12 ` Andre Noll [this message]
2009-06-17 8:23 ` Raz
2009-06-17 16:23 ` Andre Noll
2009-06-18 11:42 ` Raz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090617081238.GB6403@skl-net.de \
--to=maan@systemlinux.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=raziebe@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).