linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] md: Push down data integrity code to personalities.
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:25:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090624132507.GD6403@skl-net.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq11vpbv9ki.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2403 bytes --]

On 00:49, Martin K. Petersen wrote:

> There was a slight conflict in latest md.h against current Linus.  You
> may want to respin.

Jup, but it's trivial to fix. Neil, do you want me to resend?

> I tested on a few different configurations adding and removing devices
> with and without integrity enabled.  Looks good on this end.
> 
> Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>

Thanks. Btw, below is a trivial patch that fixes two typos in
Documentation/block/data-integrity.txt. While reading the paragraph

	Layered block devices will need to pick a profile that's
	appropriate for all subdevices.  blk_integrity_compare()
	can help with that.  DM and MD linear, RAID0 and RAID1 are
	currently supported.  RAID4/5/6 will require extra work due
	to the application tag.

I was wondering why raid10 is not mentioned and whether someone is
currently working on data integrity support for raid levels 4/5/6.

Andre

commit 5fa2be272d578d9043bd0d9102ecb257cfba8fb8
Author: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Date:   Wed Jun 24 15:22:47 2009 +0200

    Trivial typo fixes in Documentation/block/data-integrity.txt.
    
    Signed-off-by: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>

diff --git a/Documentation/block/data-integrity.txt b/Documentation/block/data-integrity.txt
index e8ca040..2d735b0 100644
--- a/Documentation/block/data-integrity.txt
+++ b/Documentation/block/data-integrity.txt
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ encouraged them to allow separation of the data and integrity metadata
 scatter-gather lists.
 
 The controller will interleave the buffers on write and split them on
-read.  This means that the Linux can DMA the data buffers to and from
+read.  This means that Linux can DMA the data buffers to and from
 host memory without changes to the page cache.
 
 Also, the 16-bit CRC checksum mandated by both the SCSI and SATA specs
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ software RAID5).
 
 The IP checksum is weaker than the CRC in terms of detecting bit
 errors.  However, the strength is really in the separation of the data
-buffers and the integrity metadata.  These two distinct buffers much
+buffers and the integrity metadata.  These two distinct buffers must
 match up for an I/O to complete.
 
 The separation of the data and integrity metadata buffers as well as
-- 
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-24 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-19 14:14 [PATCH/RFC] md: Push down data integrity code to personalities Andre Noll
2009-06-23  4:49 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-06-24 13:25   ` Andre Noll [this message]
2009-06-24 17:11     ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090624132507.GD6403@skl-net.de \
    --to=maan@systemlinux.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).