From: Info@quantum-sci.net
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RAID10 Layouts
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:27:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908210627.06241.Info@quantum-sci.net> (raw)
Hello list,
Researching RAID10, trying to learn the most advanced system for a 2 SATA drive system. Have two WD 2TB drives for a media computer, and the most important requirement is data redundancy. I realize that RAID is no substitute for backups, but this is a backup for the backups and the purpose here is data safety. The secondary goal is speed enhancement. It appears that RAID10 can give both.
First question is on layout of RAID10. In studying the man pages it seems that Far mode gives 95% of the speed of RAID0, but with increased seek for writes. And that Offset retains much of this benefit while increasing efficiency of writes. What should be the preference, Far or Offset? Are they equally as robust?
How safe is the data in Far or Offset mode? If a drive fails, will a complete, usable, bootable system exist on the other drive? (These two are the only drives in the system, which is Debian Testing, Debian kernel 2.6.30-5) Need I make any special Grub settings?
What about this Intel firmware 'RAID'? Would this assist in any way? How does it relate (if it does) to the linux md system? Should I set in BIOS to RAID, or leave it at ACPI?
How does this look:
# mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=raid10 --layout=o2 --metadata=1.2 --chunk=64 --raid-disks=2 missing /dev/sdb1
next reply other threads:[~2009-08-21 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-21 13:27 Info [this message]
2009-08-21 16:43 ` RAID10 Layouts Goswin von Brederlow
2009-08-21 18:02 ` Info
2009-08-21 19:20 ` Help Info
2009-08-21 19:38 ` Help John Robinson
2009-08-21 20:51 ` Help Info
2009-08-22 6:14 ` Help Info
2009-08-22 9:34 ` Help NeilBrown
2009-08-22 12:56 ` Help Info
2009-08-22 16:47 ` Help John Robinson
2009-08-22 18:12 ` Help Info
2009-08-22 20:45 ` Help Info
2009-08-22 20:59 ` Help Guy Watkins
[not found] ` <200908230631.46865.Info@quantum-sci.net>
2009-08-24 23:08 ` Help Info
2009-08-24 23:38 ` Help NeilBrown
2009-08-25 13:18 ` Help Info
2009-08-27 12:47 ` Help Info
2009-08-23 20:28 ` Help John Robinson
2009-08-22 6:31 ` RAID10 Layouts Goswin von Brederlow
2009-08-21 20:42 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-08-21 21:04 ` Info
2009-08-21 21:57 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200908210627.06241.Info@quantum-sci.net \
--to=info@quantum-sci.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).