From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: neilb@suse.de
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@dwd.de>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Revert "md/raid456: distribute raid processing over multiple cores"
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:18:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091002011831.24095.41501.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091002011747.24095.70355.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com>
The percpu conversion allowed a straightforward handoff of stripe
processing to the async subsytem that initially showed some modest gains
(+4%). However, this model is too simplistic and leads to stripes
bouncing between raid5d and the async thread pool for every invocation
of handle_stripe(). As reported by Holger this can fall into a
pathological situation severely impacting throughput (6x performance
loss).
Revert this for now, to be resurrected once we have a more workable
thread pool.
Reported-by: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@dwd.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
drivers/md/Kconfig | 11 -----------
drivers/md/raid5.c | 37 +++----------------------------------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/Kconfig b/drivers/md/Kconfig
index 2158377..f0fac58 100644
--- a/drivers/md/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/md/Kconfig
@@ -154,17 +154,6 @@ config MD_RAID456
If unsure, say Y.
-config MULTICORE_RAID456
- bool "RAID-4/RAID-5/RAID-6 Multicore processing (EXPERIMENTAL)"
- depends on MD_RAID456
- depends on SMP
- depends on EXPERIMENTAL
- ---help---
- Enable the raid456 module to dispatch per-stripe raid operations to a
- thread pool.
-
- If unsure, say N.
-
config MD_RAID6_PQ
tristate
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index c21cc50..11cdfe6 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -47,7 +47,6 @@
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/raid/pq.h>
#include <linux/async_tx.h>
-#include <linux/async.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include "md.h"
@@ -4349,36 +4348,6 @@ static int retry_aligned_read(raid5_conf_t *conf, struct bio *raid_bio)
return handled;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_MULTICORE_RAID456
-static void __process_stripe(void *param, async_cookie_t cookie)
-{
- struct stripe_head *sh = param;
-
- handle_stripe(sh);
- release_stripe(sh);
-}
-
-static void process_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh, struct list_head *domain)
-{
- async_schedule_domain(__process_stripe, sh, domain);
-}
-
-static void synchronize_stripe_processing(struct list_head *domain)
-{
- async_synchronize_full_domain(domain);
-}
-#else
-static void process_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh, struct list_head *domain)
-{
- handle_stripe(sh);
- release_stripe(sh);
- cond_resched();
-}
-
-static void synchronize_stripe_processing(struct list_head *domain)
-{
-}
-#endif
/*
@@ -4393,7 +4362,6 @@ static void raid5d(mddev_t *mddev)
struct stripe_head *sh;
raid5_conf_t *conf = mddev->private;
int handled;
- LIST_HEAD(raid_domain);
pr_debug("+++ raid5d active\n");
@@ -4430,7 +4398,9 @@ static void raid5d(mddev_t *mddev)
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
handled++;
- process_stripe(sh, &raid_domain);
+ handle_stripe(sh);
+ release_stripe(sh);
+ cond_resched();
spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
}
@@ -4438,7 +4408,6 @@ static void raid5d(mddev_t *mddev)
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
- synchronize_stripe_processing(&raid_domain);
async_tx_issue_pending_all();
unplug_slaves(mddev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-02 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-02 1:18 [PATCH 0/3] md fixes for 2.6.32-rc Dan Williams
2009-10-02 1:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] md/raid5: initialize conf->device_lock earlier Dan Williams
2009-10-02 1:18 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2009-10-02 1:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] Allow sysfs_notify_dirent to be called from interrupt context Dan Williams
2009-10-02 4:13 ` [PATCH 0/3] md fixes for 2.6.32-rc Neil Brown
2009-10-03 15:54 ` Dan Williams
2009-10-07 0:36 ` Dan Williams
2009-10-07 4:34 ` Neil Brown
2009-10-07 12:05 ` Holger Kiehl
2009-10-07 18:33 ` Asdo
2009-10-08 8:50 ` Holger Kiehl
2009-10-11 12:16 ` Asdo
2009-10-11 13:17 ` Asdo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091002011831.24095.41501.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Holger.Kiehl@dwd.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).