From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: berk walker <berk@panix.com>
Cc: Vladimir Dronnikov <dronnikov@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
neilb@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] md: drivers/md/unroll.pl replaced with awk analog
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 23:44:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200910052344.46809.rob@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ACA87DA.7000607@panix.com>
On Monday 05 October 2009 18:57:14 berk walker wrote:
> Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Monday 05 October 2009 11:01:39 Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
> >> From: Vladimir Dronnikov <dronnikov@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> drivers/md/unroll.pl replaced by awk script to drop build-time
> >> dependency on perl
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Dronnikov <dronnikov@gmail.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
> >
> > We already discussed this on another mailing list, thread starts at:
> >
> > http://lists.impactlinux.com/pipermail/firmware-impactlinux.com/2009-Octo
> >ber/000328.html
> >
> > I've added this as patch #4 in the perl removal series I've submitted
> > during the last few merge windows.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Rob
>
> Why is perl being removed? [I know that I have missed a lot]
> berk-
Before 2.6.25 the kernel build had never used perl, and the first perl removal
patches were submitted for 2.6.26, so the real question is "why was it added,
and was it worth it?"
There was a long thread on an earlier submission of the patches, which Alan
Cox concluded (as far as I'm concerned, unless Linus, Andrew Morton, or maybe
Al Viro want to weigh in) with this post:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0901.1/02108.html
Archives are linked from there, you might have to check adjacent weeks too.
Rob
--
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-06 4:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-05 16:01 [PATCH 1/1] md: drivers/md/unroll.pl replaced with awk analog Vladimir Dronnikov
2009-10-05 21:30 ` Rob Landley
2009-10-05 23:57 ` berk walker
2009-10-06 4:44 ` Rob Landley [this message]
2009-10-06 5:03 ` NeilBrown
2009-10-06 6:34 ` Rob Landley
2009-10-05 22:54 ` Neil Brown
2009-10-06 5:34 ` Vladimir Dronnikov
2009-10-12 6:01 ` Neil Brown
2009-10-12 6:46 ` Vladimir Dronnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200910052344.46809.rob@landley.net \
--to=rob@landley.net \
--cc=berk@panix.com \
--cc=dronnikov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).