From: Guy Martin <gmsoft@tuxicoman.be>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid 5 to raid 6 reshape failure after reboot
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:29:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091022112904.02dc09d6@zombie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19167.40181.250468.925659@notabene.brown>
Hi Neil,
Thanks, this new mdadm does fix the assemble issue.
However, I performed an additional test and it didn't go so well.
I failed one drive during the reshape and tried to remove and add it
back.
I wasn't able to remove the drive because the mdadm process running in
the background was keeping the partition open. I then decided to stop
the array and restart it but without luck.
I've performed this test with today's devel-3.1 branch.
Is this supposed to be working or no drive should fail during the reshape ?
Here are the commands that I've been issuing :
[array currently reshaping]
mdadm --fail /dev/md0 /dev/sdb1
mdadm -r /dev/md0 /dev/sdb1 -> device busy
mdadm -S /dev/md0 -> array stopped
mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/sd[bdef]1 --backup-file backup -v
mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0
mdadm: /dev/sdb1 is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 0.
mdadm: /dev/sdd1 is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 1.
mdadm: /dev/sde1 is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 3.
mdadm: /dev/sdf1 is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 2.
mdadm:/dev/md0 has an active reshape - checking if critical section needs to be restored
mdadm: backup-metadata found on backup but is not needed
mdadm: Failed to find backup of critical section
mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
Guy
> Ahhh... I wondered a bit about that as I was adding the fprintf there,
> but it was along the lines of "this cannot happen", not "this is where
> the bug might be" :-)
>
> I see now what is happening. I need to update the mtime every time I
> write the backup metadata (of course!). I never tripped on this
> because I never let a reshape run for more than a few minutes.
>
> I have checked in a patch which updated the mtime properly, so it
> should now word for you.
>
> Thanks for helping make mdadm even better!
>
> NeilBrown
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-22 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-18 16:10 Raid 5 to raid 6 reshape failure after reboot Guy Martin
2009-10-18 20:14 ` NeilBrown
2009-10-19 13:53 ` Guy Martin
2009-10-19 20:05 ` NeilBrown
2009-10-20 5:54 ` NeilBrown
2009-10-20 8:37 ` Guy Martin
2009-10-21 23:44 ` Neil Brown
2009-10-22 9:29 ` Guy Martin [this message]
2009-10-29 4:55 ` Neil Brown
2009-10-22 14:20 ` Guy Martin
2009-10-29 3:32 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091022112904.02dc09d6@zombie \
--to=gmsoft@tuxicoman.be \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).