From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>
To: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Michael Evans <mjevans1983@gmail.com>,
Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@eyal.emu.id.au>,
linux-raid list <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mismatch_cnt again
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 17:04:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091108160433.GA5338@lazy.lzy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87iqdlaujb.fsf@frosties.localdomain>
Hi,
> But unless your drive firmware is broken the drive with only ever give
> the correct data or an error. Smart has a counter for blocks that have
> gone bad and will be fixed pending a write to them:
> Current_Pending_Sector.
>
> The only way the drive should be able to give you bad data is if
> multiple bits toggle in such a way that the ECC still fits.
Not really, I've disks which are *perfect* in smart sense
and nevertheless I had mistmatch count.
This was a SW problem, I think now fixed, in RAID-10 code.
This means that, yes, there could be mismatches, without
any warning, from other sources than disks.
And these could be anywhere in the system.
I already mentioned, time ago, a cabling problem which was
leading to a similar result: wrong data on different disks,
without any warning or error from the HW layer.
That is why it is important to know *where* the mismatch
occurs and, if possible, in which device component.
If it is an empty part of the FS, no problem, if it
belongs to a specific file, then it would be possible
to restore/recreate it.
Of course, a tool will be needed telling which file is
using a certain block of the device.
bye,
--
piergiorgio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-08 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-07 0:41 mismatch_cnt again Eyal Lebedinsky
2009-11-07 1:53 ` berk walker
2009-11-07 7:49 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2009-11-07 8:08 ` Michael Evans
2009-11-07 8:42 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2009-11-07 13:51 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-07 14:58 ` Doug Ledford
2009-11-07 16:23 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-11-07 16:37 ` Doug Ledford
2009-11-07 22:25 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2009-11-07 22:57 ` Doug Ledford
2009-11-08 15:32 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-09 18:08 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-07 22:19 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2009-11-07 22:58 ` Doug Ledford
2009-11-08 15:46 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-08 16:04 ` Piergiorgio Sartor [this message]
2009-11-09 18:22 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-09 21:50 ` NeilBrown
2009-11-10 18:05 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-10 22:17 ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-11-13 2:15 ` Neil Brown
2009-11-09 19:13 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-08 22:51 ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-11-09 18:56 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-11-09 21:14 ` NeilBrown
2009-11-09 21:54 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-11-10 0:17 ` NeilBrown
2009-11-10 9:09 ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-11-10 14:03 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-11-12 22:40 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-13 17:12 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-11-14 17:01 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-17 5:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-11-14 19:04 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-17 5:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-11-10 19:52 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-11-13 2:37 ` Neil Brown
2009-11-13 5:30 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-13 9:33 ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-11-15 21:05 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-11-15 22:29 ` Guy Watkins
2009-11-16 1:23 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-16 1:37 ` Neil Brown
2009-11-16 5:21 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-16 5:35 ` Neil Brown
2009-11-16 7:40 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-12 22:57 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-09 18:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-09 20:58 ` Doug Ledford
2009-11-09 22:03 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-12 19:20 greg
2009-11-13 2:28 ` Neil Brown
2009-11-13 5:19 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-15 1:54 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-16 21:36 greg
2009-11-16 22:14 ` Neil Brown
2009-11-17 4:50 ` Goswin von Brederlow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091108160433.GA5338@lazy.lzy \
--to=piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=eyal@eyal.emu.id.au \
--cc=goswin-v-b@web.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjevans1983@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).