linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>
To: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Michael Evans <mjevans1983@gmail.com>,
	Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@eyal.emu.id.au>,
	linux-raid list <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mismatch_cnt again
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 17:04:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091108160433.GA5338@lazy.lzy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87iqdlaujb.fsf@frosties.localdomain>

Hi,

> But unless your drive firmware is broken the drive with only ever give
> the correct data or an error. Smart has a counter for blocks that have
> gone bad and will be fixed pending a write to them:
> Current_Pending_Sector.
> 
> The only way the drive should be able to give you bad data is if
> multiple bits toggle in such a way that the ECC still fits.

Not really, I've disks which are *perfect* in smart sense
and nevertheless I had mistmatch count.
This was a SW problem, I think now fixed, in RAID-10 code.

This means that, yes, there could be mismatches, without
any warning, from other sources than disks.
And these could be anywhere in the system.
I already mentioned, time ago, a cabling problem which was
leading to a similar result: wrong data on different disks,
without any warning or error from the HW layer.

That is why it is important to know *where* the mismatch
occurs and, if possible, in which device component.
If it is an empty part of the FS, no problem, if it
belongs to a specific file, then it would be possible
to restore/recreate it.

Of course, a tool will be needed telling which file is
using a certain block of the device.

bye,

-- 

piergiorgio

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-08 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-07  0:41 mismatch_cnt again Eyal Lebedinsky
2009-11-07  1:53 ` berk walker
2009-11-07  7:49   ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2009-11-07  8:08     ` Michael Evans
2009-11-07  8:42       ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2009-11-07 13:51       ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-07 14:58         ` Doug Ledford
2009-11-07 16:23           ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-11-07 16:37             ` Doug Ledford
2009-11-07 22:25               ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2009-11-07 22:57                 ` Doug Ledford
2009-11-08 15:32             ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-09 18:08               ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-07 22:19           ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2009-11-07 22:58             ` Doug Ledford
2009-11-08 15:46           ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-08 16:04             ` Piergiorgio Sartor [this message]
2009-11-09 18:22               ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-09 21:50                 ` NeilBrown
2009-11-10 18:05                   ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-10 22:17                     ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-11-13  2:15                     ` Neil Brown
2009-11-09 19:13               ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-08 22:51             ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-11-09 18:56               ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-11-09 21:14                 ` NeilBrown
2009-11-09 21:54                   ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-11-10  0:17                     ` NeilBrown
2009-11-10  9:09                       ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-11-10 14:03                         ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-11-12 22:40                           ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-13 17:12                             ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-11-14 17:01                               ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-17  5:19                                 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-11-14 19:04                               ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-17  5:22                                 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-11-10 19:52                       ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-11-13  2:37                         ` Neil Brown
2009-11-13  5:30                           ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-13  9:33                           ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-11-15 21:05                           ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-11-15 22:29                             ` Guy Watkins
2009-11-16  1:23                               ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-16  1:37                               ` Neil Brown
2009-11-16  5:21                                 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-16  5:35                                   ` Neil Brown
2009-11-16  7:40                                     ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-12 22:57                       ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-09 18:11           ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-09 20:58             ` Doug Ledford
2009-11-09 22:03 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-12 19:20 greg
2009-11-13  2:28 ` Neil Brown
2009-11-13  5:19   ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-15  1:54   ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-16 21:36 greg
2009-11-16 22:14 ` Neil Brown
2009-11-17  4:50   ` Goswin von Brederlow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091108160433.GA5338@lazy.lzy \
    --to=piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=eyal@eyal.emu.id.au \
    --cc=goswin-v-b@web.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjevans1983@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).