From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luca Berra Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] mdadm-3.1 has been withdrawn Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:27:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20091109212705.GA29754@maude.comedia.it> References: <19187.50708.551325.297625@notabene.brown> <4AF829B2.5090001@redhat.com> <4AF836F8.5040903@panix.com> <4AF8847D.8030303@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AF8847D.8030303@redhat.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:07:09PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: >overwrite the superblock), I wouldn't make it 1.2 for whole disk >devices, and in fact it might be wise to refuse to create 1.2 >superblocks on whole disk devices. Just a thought. I am against refusing to do things because users could get confused, I could agree if this would require a force flag, but not deny completely. I would think 1.1 is a good option for default. Better than 1.0 for reasons we discussed to boredom, and 1.2 is really only for special cases. i also agree on the default chunk size bump -- Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it Communication Media & Services S.r.l. /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN X AGAINST HTML MAIL / \