From: "Keld Jørn Simonsen" <keld@keldix.com>
To: "Ciprian Dorin, Craciun" <ciprian.craciun@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux MD RAID 1 read performance tunning
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:22:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091222182248.GA5719@rap.rap.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8e04b5820912220908s233c3bf9yf0fa9ba8deda693b@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 07:08:25PM +0200, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote:
> 2009/12/22 Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@keldix.com>:
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 06:34:55PM +0200, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote:
> >> Hello all!
> >>
> >> I've created a 64G RAID 1 matrix from 3 real disks. (I intend to
> >> use this as a target for backups.)
> >> Now while playing around with this array, I've observed that the
> >> read performance is quite low because it always reads from the disk in
> >> the first slot (which happens to be the slowest...)
> >>
> >> So my questions are:
> >> * is there any way to tell the MD driver to load-balance the reads
> >> between the three disks?
> >
> > It does not make sense to do distributed reading in raid1 for sequential
> > files. This is because it will not be faster to read from more drives,
> > as this will only make the reading from one drive skipping blocks on
> > that drive. In other words, in the time you use for skipping blocks on
> > one drive, you could just as well have read the blocks. So then better
> > just read all the blocks off one drive, and then do other possible IO
> > from other drives.
>
> Aha. It makes sens now. But, does it mean that if I have parallel
> IO's (from different read operations) they are going to be distributed
> between the disks?
It should, but I am not fully sure it does.
But try it out with two concurrent reads of two big files, and then
watch it with iostat
Best regards
keld
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-22 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-22 16:34 Linux MD RAID 1 read performance tunning Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
2009-12-22 16:52 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-12-22 17:08 ` Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
2009-12-22 18:22 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen [this message]
2009-12-24 9:03 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-12-24 9:16 ` Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
2009-12-24 12:41 ` Goswin von Brederlow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091222182248.GA5719@rap.rap.dk \
--to=keld@keldix.com \
--cc=ciprian.craciun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).