From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: ed.ciechanowski@intel.com, marcin.labun@intel.com,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: make recovery started by do_md_run() visible via sync_action
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:37:14 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091230123714.6c1c8571@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091222011305.27523.26165.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com>
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:18:36 -0700
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> By default md_do_sync() will perform recovery if no other actions are
> specified. However, action_show() relies on MD_RECOVERY_RECOVER to be
> set otherwise it returns 'idle'. So, add a missing set
> MD_RECOVERY_RECOVER when starting recovery.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
> Hi Neil,
>
> One more to finish off recovery checkpoint support. Without this mdmon
> never notices that the array was rebuilding and never marks the
> completion. I did not see any urgency to workaround this in the mdadm
> patchset, but let me know if you think a "kernel version > 2.6.33-rcX"
> check is warranted.
Thanks Dan.
This is "obviously correct" and I have queued it.
However...
I wonder if we want that code in do_md_run at all.
It claims to be there because if we leave the recovery to
md_check_recovery, then it will remove and re-add the spares,
and this will lose the recovery_offset information.
However presumably the same problem applies to recovery_offset
information that we set manually. Won't the call to
remove_and_add_spares() lose that information too?
I think we need to make sure that remove_and_add_spares
doesn't lose information that we want to keep, and then
remove this code from do_md_run.
So my first question is: did the current code really work for you?
It looks like it would zero recovery_offset in remove_and_add_spares ??
No, I don't think you want a kernel-version test just for this.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> drivers/md/md.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 1cc5f2d..fa93de0 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -4286,6 +4286,7 @@ static int do_md_run(mddev_t * mddev)
> if (spares && mddev->pers->sync_request) {
> mddev->recovery = 0;
> set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery);
> + set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RECOVER, &mddev->recovery);
> mddev->sync_thread = md_register_thread(md_do_sync,
> mddev,
> "resync");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-30 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-22 1:18 [PATCH] md: make recovery started by do_md_run() visible via sync_action Dan Williams
2009-12-30 1:37 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2009-12-30 4:17 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091230123714.6c1c8571@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcin.labun@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).