From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [mdadm PATCH 00/13] rebuild / resync checkpointing and other
 external metadata fixes
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:57:28 +1100
Message-ID: <20091230185728.2cd188c7@notabene.brown>
References: <20091222235807.31628.23231.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com>
	<20091230135650.05f80646@notabene.brown>
	<20091230071905.GA17485@maude.comedia.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20091230071905.GA17485@maude.comedia.it>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 08:19:05 +0100
Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:56:50PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> >On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:59:19 -0700
> >Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Neil,
> >> 
> >> The other bits are a collection of fixes to address unrelated issues
> >> discovered along the way.  The result is pushed out to:
> >> 
> >> 	git://github.com:djbw/mdadm.git master
> >> 
> >> Please have a look.
> >
> >Thanks.  Looks good.  Applied.
> >
> Hi, Dan, Neil
> I had the 'pleasure' of testing this patchset (my box keeps kicking disks
> out).
> I am pleased to note it works perfectly, thanks a lot Dan.
> 
> btw, the patches apply both to 3.0.3 and 3.1.1, Neil do you plan on
> issuing a 3.0.4 or is now 3.1 considered the stable branch?

3.1 is now the 'stable' branch - I don't plan for a 3.0.4.

NeilBrown