From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux mdadm superblock question.
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:38:17 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100216113817.5a1d1227@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100215071243.GA5068@maude.comedia.it>
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:12:43 +0100
Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 06:40:31PM -0900, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Rudy Zijlstra wrote:
> >> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >>> IMO it would make sense to support autoassemble for 1.0 superblocks, and
> sorry kernel autodetect is borked
>
> >>> making them the default. The purpose would be to get everyone off 0.9.
> >>> However, *any* default is better than 1.1.
>
> there has been a discussion on what format should be made as the
> default, under the subject: "[ANNOUNCE] mdadm-3.1 has been withdrawn",
> iirc 1.1 was chosen as the default, versus 1.2, because it puts the
> superblock at the very same place as the partition table, thus
> preventing any possible confusion between partitioned disk and whole
> disk md. (yes someone managed to put both a whole disk 1.2 superblock
> and a valid partition table on the same device....)
>
> >> As long is autodetect is supported in the kernel, i am willing to upgrade
> >> to 1.0 superblocks. BUT i need the autodetect in the kernel, as i refuse
> it wont be implemented
>
> >> to use initrd for production servers.
> > I also have to agree with Rudy in this matter .
> >
> then use kernel command line
I cannot agree with this recommendation.
Using a kernel command line like:
md=0,/dev/sda1,/dev/sdb1
will assemble v1.x arrays without an initrd. However it depends on the device
names (sda, sdb) being stable. If you also have an 'sdc', and sda dies in
such a way that it cannot be seen at all, then on the next reboot, md will
try to assemble sdb1 and sdc1 (which have now been renamed to sda1 and sdb1)
and this will fail. So it works when everything else is working, but can
then fail exactly when you need it the most.
There are other edge cases that can confuse autodetect as well. I put a lot
of effort into getting the assembly algorithms in mdadm to be as robust as I
could make them, and I really recommend using mdadm to assemble all arrays,
through an initrd if / is an md array.
If you really don't want to trust a distro initrd, then the mdadm source code
contains instructions for building a minimal initramfs which just runs mdadm
to assemble the root device, then mounts and pivot_roots to that.
If people have problems with initramfs, then I recommend filing bug reports
rather than simply choosing not to use it. It isn't going to go away.
NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-16 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-11 23:00 Linux mdadm superblock question Justin Piszcz
2010-02-12 1:52 ` Michael Evans
2010-02-12 9:06 ` Robin Hill
2010-02-12 21:53 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2010-02-16 0:57 ` Neil Brown
2010-02-16 16:42 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-02-13 19:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-13 20:07 ` Justin Piszcz
2010-02-13 20:49 ` david
2010-02-13 21:07 ` Michael Evans
2010-02-13 21:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-14 20:25 ` Asdo
2010-02-14 21:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-14 21:34 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-02-14 23:20 ` Rudy Zijlstra
2010-02-15 3:40 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2010-02-15 7:12 ` Luca Berra
2010-02-16 0:38 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2010-02-16 0:27 ` Neil Brown
2010-02-16 1:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-16 3:18 ` david
2010-02-16 4:42 ` John Robinson
2010-02-16 7:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-16 8:46 ` Rudy Zijlstra
2010-02-16 17:05 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-02-16 23:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-16 10:12 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-02-17 23:10 ` Neil Brown
2010-02-16 3:40 ` CaT
2010-02-13 6:42 ` martin f krafft
2010-02-13 8:37 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-02-13 9:26 ` Michael Evans
2010-02-13 9:35 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-02-13 9:40 ` Michael Evans
2010-02-13 10:06 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-02-16 0:50 ` Neil Brown
2010-02-16 13:14 ` Justin Piszcz
2010-02-16 20:09 ` mdadm FAQ (was: Linux mdadm superblock question.) martin f krafft
2010-02-17 23:11 ` Linux mdadm superblock question Neil Brown
2010-02-16 17:24 ` Bill Davidsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-14 1:51 Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-14 4:02 ` Michael Evans
2010-02-14 7:21 ` david
2010-02-14 8:38 ` Michael Evans
2010-02-14 18:40 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-14 18:53 ` John Robinson
2010-02-14 21:16 ` Gabor Gombas
[not found] ` <201002142013.24922.volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
2010-02-16 14:28 ` John Robinson
2010-02-16 14:37 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-16 14:46 ` Robin Hill
2010-02-16 17:23 ` John Robinson
2010-02-16 19:38 ` Luca Berra
2010-02-16 17:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-02-16 21:06 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-16 22:00 ` Nick Bowler
2010-02-16 22:18 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-17 14:25 ` Nick Bowler
2010-02-18 9:27 ` Ian Dall
2010-02-17 1:03 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2010-02-17 2:01 ` Neil Brown
2010-02-17 2:38 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-17 23:15 ` Neil Brown
2010-02-17 6:34 ` Kyle Moffett
2010-02-17 9:38 ` Rudy Zijlstra
2010-02-17 13:26 ` Frans Pop
2010-02-17 20:54 ` Gabor Gombas
2010-02-17 21:29 ` Frans Pop
2010-02-18 3:40 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-02-17 16:22 ` Kyle Moffett
2010-02-17 17:41 ` david
2010-02-17 18:10 ` Nick Bowler
2010-02-17 18:27 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-17 18:37 ` Nick Bowler
2010-02-17 18:41 ` david
2010-02-17 18:51 ` Nick Bowler
2010-02-17 21:17 ` david
2010-02-17 21:37 ` Nick Bowler
2010-02-17 22:21 ` david
2010-02-17 18:46 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-17 22:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-18 3:33 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-02-18 7:51 ` Luca Berra
2010-02-18 14:12 ` Nick Bowler
2010-02-19 9:04 ` Michael Evans
2010-02-14 19:34 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-02-14 20:07 ` Michael Evans
2010-02-14 21:14 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-02-14 20:47 ` Asdo
2010-02-14 21:26 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-02-14 21:28 ` Gabor Gombas
2010-02-15 9:08 ` martin f krafft
2010-02-15 7:51 ` Luca Berra
[not found] <edBWa-K7-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <edDXX-3XC-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <edRHA-7bL-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <eezfA-4N7-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2010-02-16 21:10 ` Bodo Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100216113817.5a1d1227@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=bluca@comedia.it \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).