linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: david@lang.hm
Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>,
	Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>,
	Kyle Moffett <kyle@moffetthome.net>,
	Rudy Zijlstra <rudy@grumpydevil.homelinux.org>,
	"Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@baby-dragons.com>,
	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
	Michael Evans <mjevans1983@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (boot time consequences of) Linux mdadm superblock question.
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:24:07 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100218102407.49f73d67@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1002171040350.4721@asgard.lang.hm>

On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:41:34 -0800 (PST)
david@lang.hm wrote:

> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Nick Bowler wrote:
> 
> > On 19:27 Wed 17 Feb     , Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >> On Mittwoch 17 Februar 2010, Nick Bowler wrote:
> >>> On 09:41 Wed 17 Feb     , david@lang.hm wrote:
> >>>> for a distro that is trying to make one kernel image run on every
> >>>> possible type of hardware features like initramfs (and udev, modeules,
> >>>> etc) are wonderful.
> >>>>
> >>>> however for people who run systems that are known ahead of time and
> >>>> static (and who build their own kernels instead of just relying on the
> >>>> distro default kernel), all of this is unnessesary complication, which
> >>>> leaves more room for problems to creep in.
> >>>
> >>> Such people can easily construct an initramfs containing busybox and
> >>> mdadm with a shell script hardcoded to mount their root fs and run
> >>> switch_root.  It's a ~10 minute jobbie that only needs to be done once.
> >>
> >> and even better when you don't have to do that one time job at all.
> >
> > But people who are building their own kernels are already doing a
> > (much harder, imo) one time job of configuring their kernels.
> >
> >> btw, what about additional delay?
> >
> > It takes about half a second for mdadm to assemble my root array, is
> > that what you're referring to?
> >
> > I assume that kernel auto-assembly is no faster, although I've never
> > used it.  Regardless, half a second isn't very long to wait.
> 
> If you are aiming for a 5-second boot time it's 10% of your total boot 
> time. That's a lot for a feature that's not needed.

It is worth noting that the Team that was recently working for v.short boot
times wanted to disable in-kernel autodetect for RAID, and added a
compile-time option to do just that.

The reason is that before the in-kernel autodetection can work reliably you
have to wait for all storage devices to have been discovered.  That wait
can unnecessarily increase the total boot time.

Using user-space autodetection, you can plug "mdadm -I" into udev, and have
arrays assembled as they are found, and filesystems mounted as arrays are
assembled, and then you just have to wait for the root filesystem to appear,
not for "all devices".

Yes, you could make the in-kernel autodetection smarter so it doesn't have to
wait quite so long, but that would make it quite a bit more complex, and it
is harder to maintain the complexity in the kernel.

NeilBrown

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-17 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-14  1:51 Linux mdadm superblock question Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-14  4:02 ` Michael Evans
2010-02-14  7:21   ` david
2010-02-14  8:38     ` Michael Evans
2010-02-14 18:40   ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-14 18:53     ` John Robinson
2010-02-14 21:16       ` Gabor Gombas
     [not found]       ` <201002142013.24922.volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
2010-02-16 14:28         ` John Robinson
2010-02-16 14:37           ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-16 14:46             ` Robin Hill
2010-02-16 17:23             ` John Robinson
2010-02-16 19:38             ` Luca Berra
2010-02-16 17:18     ` Bill Davidsen
2010-02-16 21:06       ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-16 22:00         ` Nick Bowler
2010-02-16 22:18           ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-17 14:25             ` Nick Bowler
2010-02-18  9:27             ` Ian Dall
2010-02-17  1:03       ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2010-02-17  2:01         ` Neil Brown
2010-02-17  2:38           ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-17 23:15             ` Neil Brown
2010-02-17  6:34           ` Kyle Moffett
2010-02-17  9:38             ` Rudy Zijlstra
2010-02-17 13:26               ` Frans Pop
2010-02-17 20:54                 ` Gabor Gombas
2010-02-17 21:29                   ` Frans Pop
2010-02-18  3:40                   ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-02-17 16:22               ` Kyle Moffett
2010-02-17 17:41                 ` david
2010-02-17 18:10                   ` Nick Bowler
2010-02-17 18:27                     ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-17 18:37                       ` Nick Bowler
2010-02-17 18:41                         ` david
2010-02-17 18:51                           ` Nick Bowler
2010-02-17 21:17                             ` david
2010-02-17 21:37                               ` Nick Bowler
2010-02-17 22:21                                 ` david
2010-02-17 22:29                                 ` boot times, not mdadm (was: Linux mdadm superblock question.) martin f krafft
2010-02-17 23:24                           ` Neil Brown [this message]
2010-02-17 23:50                             ` (boot time consequences of) Linux mdadm superblock question martin f krafft
2010-02-18  2:58                             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-02-18  3:26                               ` martin f krafft
2010-02-18  4:03                                 ` Daniel Reurich
2010-02-18  4:40                                   ` martin f krafft
2010-02-18  5:10                                     ` Neil Brown
2010-02-18  5:21                                       ` martin f krafft
2010-02-18  5:34                                         ` Neil Brown
2010-02-19  0:42                                           ` martin f krafft
2010-02-19  2:51                                             ` Daniel Reurich
     [not found]                                               ` <20100221171445.GB17267@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
2010-02-22  7:06                                                 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-02-22  7:37                                                   ` Bug#567468: " Michael Evans
2010-02-22  9:14                                                     ` martin f krafft
2010-02-22  9:11                                                   ` martin f krafft
2010-02-22 10:42                                                     ` Daniel Reurich
2010-02-19  9:16                                             ` Piergiorgio Sartor
     [not found]                                               ` <20100221174007.GB19058@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
     [not found]                                                 ` <20100221201304.GB2570@lazy.lzy>
2010-02-22  9:16                                                   ` Bug#567468: md homehost (was: Bug#567468: (boot time consequences of) Linux mdadm superblock) question martin f krafft
2010-02-22 11:11                                                     ` Daniel Reurich
2010-02-23  7:29                                                       ` md homehost Goswin von Brederlow
2010-02-23  8:10                                                         ` martin f krafft
2010-02-23  2:30                                                     ` md homehost (was: Bug#567468: (boot time consequences of) Linux mdadm superblock) question Neil Brown
2010-02-23  6:27                                                       ` martin f krafft
2010-02-23  7:31                                                         ` md homehost Goswin von Brederlow
2010-02-23  8:16                                                           ` Bug#567468: " martin f krafft
2010-02-24 13:13                                                             ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-02-24 17:52                                                               ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2010-02-24 22:23                                                                 ` Neil Brown
2010-02-23  8:18                                                           ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2010-02-24  0:10                                                         ` md homehost (was: Bug#567468: (boot time consequences of) Linux mdadm superblock) question Neil Brown
2010-02-24  4:12                                                           ` Michael Evans
2010-02-24 13:41                                                           ` md homehost Goswin von Brederlow
2010-02-24 22:30                                                             ` Neil Brown
2010-02-25  7:16                                                               ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-02-25  7:46                                                                 ` Neil Brown
2010-02-25  8:33                                                                   ` Michael Evans
2010-02-25 11:55                                                                 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2010-02-18  5:17                                     ` (boot time consequences of) Linux mdadm superblock question Daniel Reurich
2010-02-18  5:22                                       ` martin f krafft
2010-02-17 18:46                         ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-17 22:26                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-18  3:33                     ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-02-18  7:51                       ` Luca Berra
2010-02-18 14:12                       ` Nick Bowler
2010-02-19  9:04                         ` Michael Evans
2010-02-14 19:34   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-02-14 20:07     ` Michael Evans
2010-02-14 21:14       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-02-14 20:47     ` Asdo
2010-02-14 21:26       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-02-14 21:28       ` Gabor Gombas
2010-02-15  9:08         ` martin f krafft
2010-02-15  7:51 ` Luca Berra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100218102407.49f73d67@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=babydr@baby-dragons.com \
    --cc=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=kyle@moffetthome.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjevans1983@gmail.com \
    --cc=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
    --cc=rudy@grumpydevil.homelinux.org \
    --cc=volkerarmin@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).