From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>
Subject: Re: Device role question
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:35:21 +0100
Message-ID: <20100228103521.GA2296@lazy.lzy>
References: <20100226142331.GA2328@lazy.lzy>
 <4877c76c1002262156k6675877am79a7da9b63446dc7@mail.gmail.com>
 <20100227080845.GA2287@lazy.lzy>
 <4877c76c1002270055o2ebc038ag52e0b9a8f5b407d@mail.gmail.com>
 <20100227091027.GA3510@lazy.lzy>
 <20100228154158.6717097d@notabene.brown>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100228154158.6717097d@notabene.brown>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>, Michael Evans <mjevans1983@gmail.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Hi,

> It looks like a bug in mdadm which was fixed in 3.1.1.  It is only present in
> 3.0 and 3.0.x (I don't think you said what version of mdadm you are using).

sorry for that, it is Fedora 12, with mdadm 3.0.3
(latest available in updates).

Thanks for the clarification,

bye,

-- 

piergiorgio