Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: st0ff@npl.de,
	"Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner" <stefan.huebner@stud.tu-ilmenau.de>
Cc: Graham Mitchell <gmitch@woodlea.com>,
	Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: device and partition alignment
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 00:11:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100605221139.D066814E867@gemini.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C0AC6E4.4080408@stud.tu-ilmenau.de>

Dear Stefan,

In message <4C0AC6E4.4080408@stud.tu-ilmenau.de> you wrote:
> 
> I guess you couldn't find much about this as it has more to do with
> common sense than magic formulae.  If you have 4k-sector drives, align
> everything at multiples of 4k, use filesystem-units of multiples of 4k.
>  As I read and it also seems very logical from the ATA / SCSI point of
> view, a stripe size of 256k seems most straight forward.  This is the
> largest amount of data (a.t.m.) that can be read or written with a
> single command to a disk.

And why would that be optimal, in general?

For example, in a file system I have here (with some 15 millions
files) we see the following distribution of file sizes:

	65%   are smaller than  4 kB
	80%   are smaller than  8 kB
	90%   are smaller than 16 kB
	96%   are smaller than 32 kB
	98.4% are smaller than 64 kB 

With many write accesses going on, a stripe size of 16 KiB gives much
better performance.

I think you cannot recommend a stripe size or other specific tuning
measures without exactly knowing the characteristics of the load.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Accident: A condition in which presence of mind is good, but  absence
of body is better.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-05 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-05 20:51 device and partition alignment Graham Mitchell
2010-06-05 21:51 ` Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner
2010-06-05 22:11   ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2010-06-05 23:14     ` Graham Mitchell
2010-06-06  0:05       ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-06-06  0:19         ` Graham Mitchell
2010-06-06 10:56       ` Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100605221139.D066814E867@gemini.denx.de \
    --to=wd@denx.de \
    --cc=gmitch@woodlea.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=st0ff@npl.de \
    --cc=stefan.huebner@stud.tu-ilmenau.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox