From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Mamedov Subject: Re: migrating from RAID5 to RAID10 Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:52:30 +0600 Message-ID: <20100611005231.401529c0@natsu> References: <20100609151132.GA10082@libra.CS.Berkeley.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/chTWs32vOwE2MND+.VYHtuG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100609151132.GA10082@libra.CS.Berkeley.EDU> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/chTWs32vOwE2MND+.VYHtuG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello! On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:11:33 -0700 Gilad Arnold wrote: > I have been using RAID5 on a desktop machine using a couple of 500 GB > drives. My original intent was to grow the array by adding more drives, > as the need arises. Do you currently run RAID5 with just 2 drives, in degraded mode, or maybe y= ou meant something else? --=20 With respect, Roman --Sig_/chTWs32vOwE2MND+.VYHtuG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwRNG8ACgkQTLKSvz+PZwjhQACffwymdajamwTQCcmM40PWmOP8 KGwAn341ZlAnTQD6w9Vv2qojLD+5Wsxa =sQbZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/chTWs32vOwE2MND+.VYHtuG--