From: Gilad Arnold <arnold@cs.berkeley.edu>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>, Roman Mamedov <roman@rm.pp.ru>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: migrating from RAID5 to RAID10
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:46:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100617224657.GD8450@libra.CS.Berkeley.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100617174445.GB8450@libra.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:44:45AM -0700, Gilad Arnold wrote:
> This leads me to think that even with 2 drives, RAID10/f2 is a better
> choice than RAID1. Is this a fair assessment?
Okay, I found the benchmarks that support this hypothesis ;-)
> And, if it is the case, can RAID5 be converted to RAID10/f2
> on-the-fly, or would I have to take the longer path? (i.e. degrade
> RAID5, start RAID10 in degraded mode, copy data, kill RAID5 and
> rebuild RAID10)
Some more reading leads me to think that on-the-fly RAID5 to RAID10/f2
conversion wouldn't work. However, I'm tempted to believe that I can
avoid the data copy phase entirely and skip straight to RAID10 rebuild:
1. Shutdown the RAID5.
2. Create a RAID10/f2 on top of one drive + missing, ignoring mdadm's
warnings about an existing array. If I'm not terribly wrong, this
will give me a degraded RAID10 that still has all my data in place.
3. Add the second drive to the RAID10 and watch it rebuild.
Apologies for my petty questions ;-) Advice appreciated.
Gilad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-17 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-09 15:11 migrating from RAID5 to RAID10 Gilad Arnold
2010-06-10 18:52 ` Roman Mamedov
2010-06-10 19:58 ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-10 22:11 ` Drew
2010-06-10 22:21 ` Drew
2010-06-10 22:30 ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-10 22:26 ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-16 15:54 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-06-16 18:30 ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-16 20:15 ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-17 1:59 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-06-16 21:26 ` Neil Brown
2010-06-17 17:44 ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-17 22:30 ` Neil Brown
2010-06-18 8:40 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-06-21 22:09 ` Neil Brown
2010-06-17 22:46 ` Gilad Arnold [this message]
2010-06-18 2:39 ` Neil Brown
2010-06-18 4:01 ` Gilad Arnold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100617224657.GD8450@libra.CS.Berkeley.EDU \
--to=arnold@cs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=roman@rm.pp.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).