From: Shaochun Wang <scwang@ios.ac.cn>
To: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Write-intent bitmap decreases or increase performance of RAID5?
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:11:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100629201153.GA13018@localhost> (raw)
From what I read from the internet, write-intent bitmap decreases raid
performance and provides more stability. But in my situation, it also
increases raid performance dramatically!
My RAID5 write speed without write-intent bitmap is 90MB/s, and is
increased to 200MB/s after enabling internal write-intent bitmap. I
use ext4 filesystem on this raid array. The following is my RAID5
array information:
# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 1.0
Creation Time : Mon Nov 16 02:46:50 2009
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 10255968576 (9780.85 GiB 10502.11 GB)
Used Dev Size : 1465138368 (1397.26 GiB 1500.30 GB)
Raid Devices : 8
Total Devices : 8
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Intent Bitmap : Internal
Update Time : Wed Jun 30 03:51:56 2010
State : active
Active Devices : 8
Working Devices : 8
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Name : AOpen:00
UUID : abb2242c:6a250d29:df65e52b:426f4ed9
Events : 405636
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
4 8 17 0 active sync /dev/sdb1
1 8 33 1 active sync /dev/sdc1
2 8 49 2 active sync /dev/sdd1
3 8 65 3 active sync /dev/sde1
5 8 81 4 active sync /dev/sdf1
6 8 97 5 active sync /dev/sdg1
7 8 113 6 active sync /dev/sdh1
8 8 129 7 active sync /dev/sdi1
--
Shaochun Wang <scwang@ios.ac.cn>
Jabber: fungusw@jabber.org
next reply other threads:[~2010-06-29 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-29 20:11 Shaochun Wang [this message]
2010-06-30 5:18 ` Write-intent bitmap decreases or increase performance of RAID5? Roman Mamedov
2010-06-30 5:54 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-06-30 5:59 ` Roman Mamedov
2010-06-30 6:58 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-06-30 8:23 ` Roman Mamedov
2010-06-30 18:31 ` CoolCold
2010-07-05 0:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-07-01 6:40 ` Shaochun Wang
2010-07-01 20:30 ` Majed B.
2010-07-01 20:50 ` Roman Mamedov
2010-07-05 0:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-07-01 20:49 ` Roman Mamedov
2010-07-02 11:13 ` John Robinson
2010-07-05 0:17 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100629201153.GA13018@localhost \
--to=scwang@ios.ac.cn \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox