Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaochun Wang <scwang@ios.ac.cn>
To: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Write-intent bitmap decreases or increase performance of RAID5?
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:11:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100629201153.GA13018@localhost> (raw)

From what I read from the internet, write-intent bitmap decreases raid
performance and provides more stability. But in my situation, it also
increases raid performance dramatically!

My RAID5 write speed without write-intent bitmap is 90MB/s, and is
increased to 200MB/s after enabling internal write-intent bitmap. I
use ext4 filesystem on this raid array. The following is my RAID5
array information:

# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
        Version : 1.0
  Creation Time : Mon Nov 16 02:46:50 2009
     Raid Level : raid5
     Array Size : 10255968576 (9780.85 GiB 10502.11 GB)
  Used Dev Size : 1465138368 (1397.26 GiB 1500.30 GB)
   Raid Devices : 8
  Total Devices : 8
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent

  Intent Bitmap : Internal

    Update Time : Wed Jun 30 03:51:56 2010
          State : active
 Active Devices : 8
Working Devices : 8
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 0

         Layout : left-symmetric
     Chunk Size : 64K

           Name : AOpen:00
           UUID : abb2242c:6a250d29:df65e52b:426f4ed9
         Events : 405636

    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       4       8       17        0      active sync   /dev/sdb1
       1       8       33        1      active sync   /dev/sdc1
       2       8       49        2      active sync   /dev/sdd1
       3       8       65        3      active sync   /dev/sde1
       5       8       81        4      active sync   /dev/sdf1
       6       8       97        5      active sync   /dev/sdg1
       7       8      113        6      active sync   /dev/sdh1
       8       8      129        7      active sync   /dev/sdi1

-- 
Shaochun Wang <scwang@ios.ac.cn>

Jabber: fungusw@jabber.org

             reply	other threads:[~2010-06-29 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-29 20:11 Shaochun Wang [this message]
2010-06-30  5:18 ` Write-intent bitmap decreases or increase performance of RAID5? Roman Mamedov
2010-06-30  5:54   ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-06-30  5:59     ` Roman Mamedov
2010-06-30  6:58       ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-06-30  8:23         ` Roman Mamedov
2010-06-30 18:31           ` CoolCold
2010-07-05  0:11         ` Bill Davidsen
2010-07-01  6:40     ` Shaochun Wang
2010-07-01 20:30       ` Majed B.
2010-07-01 20:50         ` Roman Mamedov
2010-07-05  0:14         ` Bill Davidsen
2010-07-01 20:49       ` Roman Mamedov
2010-07-02 11:13         ` John Robinson
2010-07-05  0:17         ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100629201153.GA13018@localhost \
    --to=scwang@ios.ac.cn \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox