From: Roman Mamedov <roman@rm.pp.ru>
To: Shaochun Wang <scwang@ios.ac.cn>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Write-intent bitmap decreases or increase performance of RAID5?
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:18:54 +0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100630111854.006ec4d0@natsu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100629201153.GA13018@localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1020 bytes --]
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:11:54 +0800
Shaochun Wang <scwang@ios.ac.cn> wrote:
> From what I read from the internet, write-intent bitmap decreases raid
> performance and provides more stability. But in my situation, it also
> increases raid performance dramatically!
>
> My RAID5 write speed without write-intent bitmap is 90MB/s, and is
> increased to 200MB/s after enabling internal write-intent bitmap. I
> use ext4 filesystem on this raid array.
How do you measure that speed exactly? The proper (and also quite simple) way
to do it is to run the following test several times (assuming that current dir
is some directory on the array):
dd if=/dev/zero of=zerofile bs=1M count=2048 conv=fdatasync,notrunc
Also, I see you run an 8-drive RAID5 on 1.5TB drives, so make sure you are
aware of the issues described in:
http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/10/21/2126252
http://louwrentius.blogspot.com/2008/08/why-raid-1-and-5-will-kill-you-some-day.html
--
With respect,
Roman
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-30 5:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-29 20:11 Write-intent bitmap decreases or increase performance of RAID5? Shaochun Wang
2010-06-30 5:18 ` Roman Mamedov [this message]
2010-06-30 5:54 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-06-30 5:59 ` Roman Mamedov
2010-06-30 6:58 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-06-30 8:23 ` Roman Mamedov
2010-06-30 18:31 ` CoolCold
2010-07-05 0:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-07-01 6:40 ` Shaochun Wang
2010-07-01 20:30 ` Majed B.
2010-07-01 20:50 ` Roman Mamedov
2010-07-05 0:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-07-01 20:49 ` Roman Mamedov
2010-07-02 11:13 ` John Robinson
2010-07-05 0:17 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100630111854.006ec4d0@natsu \
--to=roman@rm.pp.ru \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scwang@ios.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).