linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keld Simonsen <keld@keldix.com>
To: Marco <jjletho67-diar@yahoo.it>
Cc: Roman Mamedov <roman@rm.pp.ru>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: raid1 performance
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:24:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100726102406.GA8415@rap.rap.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23123.42111.qm@web28503.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 09:37:20AM +0000, Marco wrote:
> 
> 
> >> doing a simple performance tests i obtained some very unexpected results: if
> >> i issue hdparm -t /dev/md2 i obtain 61 - 65 MB/s while issuing the same test 
> >> directly on the partitions which compose md2 (/dev/sda3 and /dev/sdb3) i
> >> obtain 84 - 87 MB/s. I didn't expect a so big difference between md2 and one
> >> of its member. What can cause  this difference ? 
> >
> >Maybe their read-ahead settings are different?
> >Check out "blockdev --getra /dev/md2", and compare that with the same
> >setting of the member disks. You can experiment with changing it by using
> >"--setra" as well.
> 
> Hi Roman,
> thank you for your hint, I verified the read-ahead settings and they are the 
> same for all the block devices involved in the test: the value is 256 for all 
> /dev/sd?? and for all /dev/md?
> there should be something else which is influencing  raid 1 performance.
> Have someone of you ever had a similar issue ?

Did you try:

# Set read-ahead.
echo "Setting read-ahead to 64 MiB for /dev/md3"
blockdev --setra 65536 /dev/md3

Best regards
keld

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-26 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-25 14:58 raid1 performance Marco
2010-07-25 15:19 ` Roman Mamedov
2010-07-26  9:37   ` Marco
2010-07-26 10:24     ` Keld Simonsen [this message]
2010-07-26 10:53       ` John Robinson
2010-07-26 11:30         ` Keld Simonsen
2010-07-27 16:10       ` Marco
2010-07-26 11:03     ` Neil Brown
2010-07-27  1:23       ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-07-27 16:10       ` Marco
2010-07-27 22:23         ` Neil Brown
2010-07-28 12:10           ` Marco
2010-07-28 12:24             ` Neil Brown
2010-07-31 15:21           ` Marco
2010-07-31 16:04             ` Keld Simonsen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-19 12:14 Marco
2004-04-21  5:57 RAID1: Performance Mike Mestnik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100726102406.GA8415@rap.rap.dk \
    --to=keld@keldix.com \
    --cc=jjletho67-diar@yahoo.it \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roman@rm.pp.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).