From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: ravichandra <vmynidi@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem regarding RAID10 on kernel 2.6.31
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 18:10:42 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100809181042.2dd7f7ca@notabene> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1281339596.18581.34.camel@venkata-pc.in.caveonetworks.com>
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:09:56 +0530
ravichandra <vmynidi@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks.The patch you have sent is working.There is no hanging up
> after the patch is applied.can you elaborate on the problem which was
> there earlier??
>
It's .... complicated.
An important fact is that generic_make_request queues recursive requests
rather than issuing them immediately. This avoids excessive stack usage with
stacked block devices.
So in the case where a read crosses a chunk boundary, raid10:make_request
issues two separate generic_make_request calls to two different devices, each
preceded by a wait_barrier call (Which is cancelled with allow_barrer() when
the request completes).
The first is queued and will not be issued until the second is also queued and
the raid10:make_request call completes.
The wait_barrier call increments nr_pending.
If the resync/recovery thread tries to 'raise_barrier' between these calls,
it will find nr_pending set and will wait with ->barrier incremented so when
the next wait_barrier is attempted, is will block - forever.
If generic_make_request didn't queue things, the first request would
complete, nr_pending would decrement, resync would proceed with a single
request, then the second wait_barrier would complete and the second request
could be submitted.
The fix was to elevate conf->nr_waiting for the duration of both submissions
so raise_barrier holds off setting ->barrier until both submissions are
complete.
Hope that makes sense.
NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-09 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-06 9:41 Problem regarding RAID10 on kernel 2.6.31 ravichandra
2010-08-06 10:14 ` Neil Brown
2010-08-09 7:39 ` ravichandra
2010-08-09 8:10 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2010-10-18 21:23 ` Hari Subramanian
2010-10-18 22:38 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100809181042.2dd7f7ca@notabene \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vmynidi@caviumnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).